2020
DOI: 10.18335/region.v6i3.309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fueling Research Transparency: Computational Notebooks and the Discussion Section

Abstract: The results of academic research, often publicly funded, should be easily available for a wide audience that includes fellow researchers, policy makers, journalists and anyone who takes an interest. On top of this, the research itself should be done in a transparent way so that results can be reproduced or perhaps falsified, as transparent research is good practice across all academic disciplines. Arguably, however, it is even more central in fields such as Regional Science with salient and tangible implicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developments described above adds to those reported in Koster, Rowe (2020). We are convinced that these enhancements will contribute to the long-term vision of increasing the visibility and quality submissions to REGION.…”
Section: E2mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The developments described above adds to those reported in Koster, Rowe (2020). We are convinced that these enhancements will contribute to the long-term vision of increasing the visibility and quality submissions to REGION.…”
Section: E2mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…An open approach requires that the code generating the final dataset from the initial one(s) is available in both machine and human readable form. An increasingly popular format to meet this requirement within scientific communities is the computational notebook, such as Jupyter notebooks (Rule et al 2019 ) or Rmarkdown notebooks (Casado-Díaz et al 2017 ; Koster and Rowe 2019 ). In cases where commercial interest and copyright law prevents code sharing, so-called pseudo code with enough detail to reproduce the steps can be an acceptable compromise.…”
Section: The Building Blocks Of Open Data Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rowe et al 2017 ), all elements hard to cover on a traditional research paper. Journals, such as REGION, have also started publishing computational notebooks, and a key aim is their added value in communicating and disseminating ODPs (Koster and Rowe 2019 ). Notebooks offer interactivity with the potential to engage policy, discipline-specific or local knowledge experts with data analysis exploration (Rowe et al 2020 ).…”
Section: The Building Blocks Of Open Data Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scandals regarding a lack of transparency and reproducibility have generated attention across the scientific world. In response, reform efforts have coalesced around the notion of open science-which promotes transparent, well-documented, and publicly disseminated research-so third parties can fully understand and replicate the workflows (Boeing, 2020a;Koster and Rowe, 2020;Wilson et al, 2020;Poorthuis and Zook, 2019;Rey, 2009).…”
Section: Gis and Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%