2022
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2148172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fueling opposition? Yellow vests, urban elites, and fuel taxation

Abstract: OSM-3. Yellow Vests and Urban Elites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results thus point to a generalized cognitive mechanism shaping policy support, in line with the mental accounting heuristic. Importantly, this finding is compatible with variations in earmarking preferences, for instance between different socio-demographic groups [24]. The mental accounting heuristic does not imply that citizens always prefer green earmarking of carbon tax revenue to any other earmarking scheme.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results thus point to a generalized cognitive mechanism shaping policy support, in line with the mental accounting heuristic. Importantly, this finding is compatible with variations in earmarking preferences, for instance between different socio-demographic groups [24]. The mental accounting heuristic does not imply that citizens always prefer green earmarking of carbon tax revenue to any other earmarking scheme.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Focus groups conducted among French citizens suggest that earmarking energy tax revenues for environmental purposes is seen as the most acceptable solution for almost all participants, whereas using tax revenues to reduce the VAT or labor taxes is perceived negatively in most groups [21]. Moreover, several quantitative studies showed that policy support is significantly higher when carbon tax revenues are earmarked for environmental purposes rather than redistributed to households [16,22,23], although these earmarking preferences can vary across socio-demographic groups [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This very direct measure of self-interest related to the tax seems to crowd out any other socioeconomic effects. However, in the cases where such measure of usage and self-interest is not included, then I do find that education and income do matter for attitudes (Hedegaard, 2022;Tatham & Peters, 2023).…”
Section: Socioeconomic Positionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In the French context, Douenne and Fabre (2020) also find strong opposition to a carbon tax on gasoline and diesel and note that there are variations in this between urban and rural areas (for more on the rural-urban divide see Arndt et al, 2022). Building on that, Tatham and Peters (2023) compare attitudes to indirect carbon taxes on gasoline in Norway, especially focusing on the differences between urban elites and rural low-income groups (inspired by the Yellow Vests movement in France). They find that this geographic and socioeconomic divide also exists in Norway, but also that it can be bridged through revenue recycling.…”
Section: Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, green taxes are an exemplary case study of what Jacobs (2016) described as "intertemporal trade-offs between maximizing social welfare in the present and investing in the future" (p. 434). In addition, green taxes are often regressive, particularly in high-income countries (Kallbekken and Saeaelen 2011;Baranzini and Carattini 2017), leading to concerns about unjust distributional effects (Cullenward and Victor 2020) and potential political backlash (Tatham and Peters 2023).…”
Section: Green Tax Design and The Role Of Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%