2012
DOI: 10.1021/ie301530j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel Particle Conversion of Pulverized Biomass during Pyrolysis in an Entrained Flow Reactor

Abstract: This study addresses the change of char morphology and fuel conversion during pyrolysis in a laminar entrained flow reactor by experiments and particle simulation. Three experimental parameters were examined: reaction temperature (1073 and 1273 K); particle size (125−250, 250−500, and 500−1000 μm); and the length of reaction zone (650 and 1885 mm). The scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images showed that biomass swelled during heating and shrank during initial stage of pyrolysis. Then, char morphology transf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(A). The residence times of 1 mm and 0.25 mm particles amounted to 1.4 ± 0.1 s and 3.3 ± 0.2 s, respectively, while the gas residence time was about 50.7 s. These measurements indicate a strong dependence of the particle residence time on the diameter of the fluidized particles and support theoretical predictions of Dupont et al [23], Umeki et al [52] and Kirtania and Bhattacharya [53]. This will be discussed in the following with the help of a general model.…”
Section: Particle Residence Time and Slip Velocitysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3(A). The residence times of 1 mm and 0.25 mm particles amounted to 1.4 ± 0.1 s and 3.3 ± 0.2 s, respectively, while the gas residence time was about 50.7 s. These measurements indicate a strong dependence of the particle residence time on the diameter of the fluidized particles and support theoretical predictions of Dupont et al [23], Umeki et al [52] and Kirtania and Bhattacharya [53]. This will be discussed in the following with the help of a general model.…”
Section: Particle Residence Time and Slip Velocitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“….2-4 but used α = 0.15 and β = 0.687 (Schiller-Naumann expression [57]) in order to calculate the drag force coefficient. Residence times of 9 and 0.7 s for 0.1 mm and 1 mm particles, respectively, were calculated for a reactor length of 1.9 m at 1000°C by Umeki et al [52]. These residence times are higher than the ones presented in Fig.…”
Section: Fuel Fractionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method for calculation of the entrained flow parameters, including Reynolds number, particle drag coefficient, slip velocity and particle residence time, is described elsewhere. 15 The particle residence time, within certain ranges depending on particle properties, can also be controlled by the gas flow rate.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid heating of small biomass particles and the short residence time at high temperatures minimize the char yield and increase char reactivity [5]. The majority of previous investigations [3,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] referred to low-ash containing feedstocks (softwood, hardwood). The effects of heating rate and temperature on the morphological transformations at both slow (b 10 ∘ C/s) and intermediate and fast pyrolysis environments (N 100 ∘ C/s) of the same feedstock were rarely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%