2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel injection model for Euler–Euler and Euler–Lagrange large-eddy simulations of an evaporating spray inside an aeronautical combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A model is therefore needed for the description of the resulting dispersed liquid phase that is injected in the simulations, (2) The evolution of the droplet mist has to be described at a computational cost consistent with the available resources. Two main approaches exist for the large eddy simulation of two-phase reacting flows, both relying on mesoscopic models [12]: the Eulerian-Eulerian approach, where moments of the number density function (NDF) are transported [13,14] and the Eulerian-Lagrangian model where a set of individual particles are being tracked [15][16][17]. In the Eulerian-Lagrangian framework, it is relatively easy to account for polydispersion, while the Eulerian-Eulerian approach requires an additional set of transport equations for each moment and/or class of particle sizes, notably increasing the computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model is therefore needed for the description of the resulting dispersed liquid phase that is injected in the simulations, (2) The evolution of the droplet mist has to be described at a computational cost consistent with the available resources. Two main approaches exist for the large eddy simulation of two-phase reacting flows, both relying on mesoscopic models [12]: the Eulerian-Eulerian approach, where moments of the number density function (NDF) are transported [13,14] and the Eulerian-Lagrangian model where a set of individual particles are being tracked [15][16][17]. In the Eulerian-Lagrangian framework, it is relatively easy to account for polydispersion, while the Eulerian-Eulerian approach requires an additional set of transport equations for each moment and/or class of particle sizes, notably increasing the computational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work a coupled Eulerian (for the gas-phase flow) and Lagrangian (for the liquid-phase flow) formulation is used to represent the spray dynamics and the interaction between the gas and liquid phases flow [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The Eulerian-Lagrangian framework represents a natural approach for flows where a dispersed phase is present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, particles are directly injected at the atomizer orifice using semi-empirical relations to specify their velocities while relying on experimental data to determine their size distribution [36]. The velocity profile used for particle injection is then made of two components, a constant axial velocity deduced from liquid mass conservation at the atomizer nozzle and an azimuthal velocity component resulting from the swirling motion imposed to the liquid within the atomizer.…”
Section: Injection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are deduced using empirical correlations of the literature [20] based on the orifice radius R 0 = 0.5 mm, the liquid mass flow rateṁ l = 2.25 g s −1 and the spray half angle θ 0 s = 40 • . The reader is referred to Sanjose et al [36] for more details on the injection procedure. The experimental particle size distribution is approximated via a log-normal law:…”
Section: Injection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%