2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel exploitation among Neanderthals based on the anthracological record from Abric Romaní (Capellades, NE Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification of black pine and / or scots pine at this site represents the earliest evidence in Iberia of its use as fuel. While cryophilous pines (Pinus nigra, P. sylvestris, P. mugo, P. uncinata) are easily distinguishable from thermophilous pines (Schweingruber 1976), difficulties arise when attempting to distinguish between the different species of highland pines (Allué, Solé, and Burguet-Coca 2016;Badal and Carrión 2001;Badal et al 2012a;Badal, Villaverde, and Zilhão 2012b;Postigo-Mijarra, Gómez-Manzaneque, and Morla 2017;Vidal-Matutano et al 2015). Taking into account the anatomy of the wood, the discrimination of these four species is barely feasible, although Pinus mugo and Pinus uncinata can be discarded based on the location of the site at a low altitude, since these two species are limited to higher elevations (above 1900-2000 m a.s.l.).…”
Section: Palaeoecological Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The identification of black pine and / or scots pine at this site represents the earliest evidence in Iberia of its use as fuel. While cryophilous pines (Pinus nigra, P. sylvestris, P. mugo, P. uncinata) are easily distinguishable from thermophilous pines (Schweingruber 1976), difficulties arise when attempting to distinguish between the different species of highland pines (Allué, Solé, and Burguet-Coca 2016;Badal and Carrión 2001;Badal et al 2012a;Badal, Villaverde, and Zilhão 2012b;Postigo-Mijarra, Gómez-Manzaneque, and Morla 2017;Vidal-Matutano et al 2015). Taking into account the anatomy of the wood, the discrimination of these four species is barely feasible, although Pinus mugo and Pinus uncinata can be discarded based on the location of the site at a low altitude, since these two species are limited to higher elevations (above 1900-2000 m a.s.l.).…”
Section: Palaeoecological Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the anatomy of the wood, the discrimination of these four species is barely feasible, although Pinus mugo and Pinus uncinata can be discarded based on the location of the site at a low altitude, since these two species are limited to higher elevations (above 1900-2000 m a.s.l.). When trying to differentiate Pinus nigra from Pinus sylvestris, some authors take into account the distribution of the resin ducts in the growth rings as well as the characteristics of the ray tracheid walls in mature specimens (Rubiales et al 2007), whereas other researchers believe that current knowledge does not allow for the unequivocal distinction of these species (Allué, Solé, and Burguet-Coca 2016;Allué et al, in press;Badal and Carrión 2001;Roiron et al 2013;Schweingruber 1976; Vidal-Matutano 2017; Vidal- et al 2015). This is why 'approximate' nomenclatures are used by different authors: Pinus nigra-sylvestris is favoured by some, while others prefer Pinus type sylvestris.…”
Section: Palaeoecological Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations