2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40295-020-00228-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel-Efficient Powered Descent Guidance on Large Planetary Bodies via Theory of Functional Connections

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primarily, TFC is used for the solution of DEs because the CEs eliminate the "curse of the equation constraints" [39][40][41]. Moreover, TFC has already been used to solve different classes of optimal control space guidance problems such as energy optimal landing on large and small planetary bodies [42,43], fuel optimal landing on large planetary bodies [44], energy optimal relative motion problems subject to Clohessy-Wiltshire dynamics [45], and classes of transport theory problems, such as radiative transfer [46] and rarefied-gas dynamics [47]. For tackling DEs, the standard (or Vanilla as defined in [48,49]) TFC method employs a linear combination of orthogonal polynomials, such as Legendre or Chebyshev polynomials [39,40], as a free function.…”
Section: Physics-informed Neural Network and Functional Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, TFC is used for the solution of DEs because the CEs eliminate the "curse of the equation constraints" [39][40][41]. Moreover, TFC has already been used to solve different classes of optimal control space guidance problems such as energy optimal landing on large and small planetary bodies [42,43], fuel optimal landing on large planetary bodies [44], energy optimal relative motion problems subject to Clohessy-Wiltshire dynamics [45], and classes of transport theory problems, such as radiative transfer [46] and rarefied-gas dynamics [47]. For tackling DEs, the standard (or Vanilla as defined in [48,49]) TFC method employs a linear combination of orthogonal polynomials, such as Legendre or Chebyshev polynomials [39,40], as a free function.…”
Section: Physics-informed Neural Network and Functional Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed derivation of the switching functions is reported in the work of Johnston et al [21]. Here, for the convenience of the reader we just report them.…”
Section: Appendix a Switching Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, TFC is widely used for the solution of DEs, because the CEs remove the "curse of the equation constraints" [16][17][18]. Additionally, TFC has already been used to solve several classes of optimal control space guidance problems such as energy optimal landing on large and small planetary bodies [19,20], fuel optimal landing on large planetary bodies [21], and energy optimal relative motion problems subject to Clohessy-Wiltshire dynamics [22]. For solving DEs, the standard TFC method uses a linear combination of orthogonal polynomials, such as Legendre or Chebyshev polynomials [16,17], as a free function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TFC has been developed for univariate and multivariate scenarios [2,7,8] to solve a variety of mathematical problems: a homotopy continuation algorithm for dynamics and control problems [14], domain mapping [15], data-driven parameters discovery applied to epidemiological compartmental models [16], transport theory problems such as radiative transfer [17] and rarefied-gas dynamics [18], nonlinear programming under equality constraints [19], Timoshenko-Ehrenfest beam [20], boundary-value problems in hybrid systems [21], eighth-order boundary value problems [22], and in Support Vector Machine [23]. TFC has been widely used for solving optimal control problems for space application, solved via indirect methods [24]: orbit transfer and propagation [25][26][27][28], energy-optimal in relative motion [29], energy-optimal and fuel-efficient landing on small and large planetary bodies [30,31], the minimum time-energy optimal intercept problem [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%