2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel efficiency and air pollutant concentrations of wood-burning improved cookstoves in Malawi: Implications for scaling-up cookstove programs

Abstract: National governments and other key stakeholders in developing countries are grappling with how to reduce household air pollution (HAP) resulting from cooking with solid fuels using traditional cooking technologies. Recent studies have shown that improved cookstoves may offer reductions in fuel use and harmful emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), yet there is little quantitative evidence collected in a “real-world” setting showing how improved stoves perform directly compared t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A well-understood limitation of previous household energy programs was that air pollution emissions from improved cookstoves in community settings greatly exceeded what was expected based on laboratory testing (Coffey et al 2017;Eilenberg et al 2018). Clean fuel interventions with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), electric induction, ethanol, biogas, and pellet-fueled gasifier stoves have consistently outperformed traditional and improved solid-fuel stoves in both laboratory and field studies (Champion and Grieshop 2019;Jagger et al 2017;Wathore et al 2017) and are the most likely to achieve the desired air quality and health benefits.…”
Section: Where Hap Programs Have Underdeliveredmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A well-understood limitation of previous household energy programs was that air pollution emissions from improved cookstoves in community settings greatly exceeded what was expected based on laboratory testing (Coffey et al 2017;Eilenberg et al 2018). Clean fuel interventions with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), electric induction, ethanol, biogas, and pellet-fueled gasifier stoves have consistently outperformed traditional and improved solid-fuel stoves in both laboratory and field studies (Champion and Grieshop 2019;Jagger et al 2017;Wathore et al 2017) and are the most likely to achieve the desired air quality and health benefits.…”
Section: Where Hap Programs Have Underdeliveredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in the preceding two sections, there are numerous examples of projects that have underdelivered because of shortcomings of the technology. Many improved biomass stoves do not deliver the air pollution reductions required to greatly minimize adverse health impacts, although they do reduce fuel use and may provide some reduction in air pollution (Jagger et al 2017). Improved water supplies do not necessarily provide water that is safe at the point of collection (Bain et al 2014), in part because most household water treatment options fail to cover the full array of waterborne pathogens or fail to keep water safe after it is treated (Shaheed et al 2014).…”
Section: Diagnosing the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above is indicative of the Malawian climate in which ICS research and development finds itself. Cookstoves are foremost in Malawian policy agenda, cutting across energy, environment, health, and gender sectors (Jagger et al, 2017). ICS implementaion is supported by a growing diversity of cookstove research in Malawi, including: Wathore et al 2017…”
Section: Study Setting and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%