2011
DOI: 10.1017/s000192400000631x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel effects on range versus payload for modern jet aircraft

Abstract: g Gravitational constant (m/s 2 ) IFR Instrument Flight Rules LCV Lower calorific value (specific energy) (MJ/kg) L/D Lift/Drag ratio R Range (km) SPK synthetic paraffinic kerosene sfc Specific fuel consumption (mg/Ns) V flight speed (ms -1 ) W Weight (N) ρ Density (kg/m 3 ) Subscripts 0 Initial condition at start of flight cycle e empty f fuel i Section of flight cycle p payload ABSTRACTWith changes in the availability and quality of existing aviation fuels anticipated in the next 30 years it is timely to ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where weight capacity is the limiting factor, as is the case with most civil aviation flights, it is desirable to have a fuel that produces high energy per unit mass whereas in applications in which range is to be maximized. The volumetric energy content of the fuel is the most important parameter, and a higher volumetric energy content is desirable [33]. The PKO bio-jet in this study was found to have an energy content of 38.3 MJ.kg -1 , lower when compared to the conventional jet fuel 42 MJ.kg -1 .…”
Section: Properties Of Bio-jet Fuel and Gas Turbine Engine Testingmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Where weight capacity is the limiting factor, as is the case with most civil aviation flights, it is desirable to have a fuel that produces high energy per unit mass whereas in applications in which range is to be maximized. The volumetric energy content of the fuel is the most important parameter, and a higher volumetric energy content is desirable [33]. The PKO bio-jet in this study was found to have an energy content of 38.3 MJ.kg -1 , lower when compared to the conventional jet fuel 42 MJ.kg -1 .…”
Section: Properties Of Bio-jet Fuel and Gas Turbine Engine Testingmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For most civil aircrafts with a restricted payload weight, the effective payload must be promoted by increasing the gravimetric NHOC. On the contrary, for volume-limited aircraft vehicles, such as rockets and missiles, in which the fuel tank must be designed to be small enough to save sufficient space for the electronic components and electrical equipment, the priority is to increase the volumetric NHOC for maximum flight range [32,64,65].…”
Section: Nhocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy density of a potential fuel impacts on the range vs. payload and a high energy density is vital in trying to maximise the passenger and cargo capacity while retaining range. Where weight capacity is the limiting factor, as is the case with most civil aviation flights, it is desirable to have a fuel that produces the most energy per unit mass whereas in applications where range is to be maximised, the volumetric energy content of the fuel is the most important parameter, and a higher volumetric energy content is desirable [27]. The Jet A-1 used in this study was found to have an energy content of 43.521 MJ kg -1 .…”
Section: Energy Density (Lower Calorific Value)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was used for the fuels investigated in this study (Eq. 2) where sfc = specific fuel consumption and LCV = lower calorific value of kerosene (LCVkero) and alternative fuel (LCValt) [27]. The payload range was calculated up to the maximum volumetric capacity of the fuel tanks (Fig.…”
Section: Simplified Payload Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%