Fuel Burn Estimation Using Real Track Data

Abstract

A procedure for estimating fuel burned based on actual flight track data, and drag and fuel-flow models is described. The procedure consists of estimating aircraft and wind states, lift, drag and thrust. Fuel-flow for jet aircraft is determined in terms of thrust, true airspeed and altitude as prescribed by the Base of Aircraft Data fuel-flow model. This paper provides a theoretical foundation for computing fuel-flow with most of the information derived from actual flight data. The procedure does not require an explicit model of thrust and calibrated airspeed/Mach profile which are typically needed for trajectory synthesis. To validate the fuel computation method, flight test data provided by the Federal Aviation Administration were processed. Results from this method show that fuel consumed can be estimated within 1% of the actual fuel consumed in the flight test. Next, fuel consumption was estimated with simplified lift and thrust models. Results show negligible difference with respect to the full model without simplifications. An iterative takeoff weight estimation procedure is described for estimating fuel consumption, when takeoff weight is unavailable, and for establishing fuel consumption uncertainty bounds. Finally, the suitability of using radar-based position information for fuel estimation is examined. It is shown that fuel usage could be estimated within 5.4% of the actual value using positions reported in the Airline Situation Display to Industry data with simplified models and iterative takeoff weight computation.

Adaptive Algorithm to Improve Trajectory Prediction Accuracy of Climbing Aircraft

“…It should be emphasized that the objective of this algorithm is not to estimate actual aircraft weight [12] or fuel burn [13]. In fact, due to the wide range of sources of uncertainty that cause climb trajectory prediction errors, the algorithm may move the modeled aircraft weight away from the true aircraft weight.…”

Separation-Compliant Time Advance in Terminal Area Arrivals: Tradeoff between Makespan and Fuel Burn

“…This derivation is based on a number of simplifying assumptions and may not carry the fidelity of the other, considerably more complicated, models, such as that in Ref. 19 The parameters and notation used in what follows are listed in Table 1.…”

Support vector machine and ROC curves for modeling of aircraft fuel consumption

“…Aircraft fuel efficiency becomes a critical measure for aircraft manufacturers and air service providers. Improving fuel efficiency benefits the throughput improvement and capacity increase, and it benefits the globalized environment (Chatterji, 2011;Peeters et al, 2005). The expectation of fuel efficiency drove a number of policy and procedural measures in developing cost-effective and environmentally friendly technologies for aviation (Oza & Das, 2012).…”