2016
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.123448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FTO genotype and weight loss in diet and lifestyle interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Studies have suggested that the fat mass and obesityassociated (FTO) genotype is associated with individual variability in weight loss in response to diet/lifestyle interventions, but results are inconsistent. Objective: We aimed to provide a summary of the literature evaluating the relation between the FTO genotype and weight loss in response to diet/lifestyle interventions. Design: A search of English-language articles in the PubMed and Embase databases (through 30 April 2015) was performed. Elig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(93 reference statements)
4
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1B is compared with children in low polygenic risk score (PRS) group. 33,34 de Lauzon-Guillain reported that the effect of the body mass index genetic risk score (BMI-GRS) on BMI was weakest among those with the highest levels of cognitive restraint (CR), which indicated that increasing CR might help to mitigate genetic susceptibility to obesity. 33,34 de Lauzon-Guillain reported that the effect of the body mass index genetic risk score (BMI-GRS) on BMI was weakest among those with the highest levels of cognitive restraint (CR), which indicated that increasing CR might help to mitigate genetic susceptibility to obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1B is compared with children in low polygenic risk score (PRS) group. 33,34 de Lauzon-Guillain reported that the effect of the body mass index genetic risk score (BMI-GRS) on BMI was weakest among those with the highest levels of cognitive restraint (CR), which indicated that increasing CR might help to mitigate genetic susceptibility to obesity. 33,34 de Lauzon-Guillain reported that the effect of the body mass index genetic risk score (BMI-GRS) on BMI was weakest among those with the highest levels of cognitive restraint (CR), which indicated that increasing CR might help to mitigate genetic susceptibility to obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with Delahanty et al [4] , we did not find associations between these SNPs and weight loss, although the FTO SNP showed a treatment-specific effect. A recent meta-analysis [5] suggested that the AA genotype of the FTO SNP, but not the TA genotype, was associated with significantly more weight loss than the TT genotype in diet and lifestyle interventions (difference -0.72 kg [95% CI: -1.21, +0.23 kg]; p = 0.004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first evidence for a role of genetic predisposition in weight loss and weight regain came from a study by Delahanty et al [4] , which showed that several gene variants were associated with short-and long-term weight loss and weight regain. Based on a meta-analysis of available studies, Xiang et al [5] concluded that individuals carrying the homozygous fat mass and obesity-associated (FTO) obesity-predisposing allele lose more weight by means of diet or lifestyle interventions than noncarriers. Knowledge of such predictors might help to explain interindividual variations in weight loss success and lead to more personalized treatments for weight loss and weight loss maintenance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Component scores were used as neural predictors of weight loss. For the FTO genotype predictor, A/A and T/A of the FTO rs9939609 were coded 0 while the T/T genotype was coded 1 because a meta‐analysis of BWL interventions showed that carriers of the FTO A/A and T/A genotypes have greater weight loss than those with the T/T . The neural and genotype predictors were simultaneously entered into separate hierarchical linear regressions predicting weight loss in BWL from baseline to 12, 36, and 60 weeks post‐baseline and from 12 to 36 weeks, 12 to 60 weeks, and 36 to 60 weeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%