2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-016-0321-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FTA-FMEA-based validity verification techniques for safety standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a critical weighing index was added to these methods in order to determine critical equipment for effective maintenance planning [37]. Several explorations have successfully developed a combined quantitative FTA and FMEA method to enhance risk analysis results [38]- [40]. Furthermore, the integration of the methods with Fuzzy Analysis has been employed to optimize qualitative analysis [41], [42].…”
Section: Fta and Fmeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a critical weighing index was added to these methods in order to determine critical equipment for effective maintenance planning [37]. Several explorations have successfully developed a combined quantitative FTA and FMEA method to enhance risk analysis results [38]- [40]. Furthermore, the integration of the methods with Fuzzy Analysis has been employed to optimize qualitative analysis [41], [42].…”
Section: Fta and Fmeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What for?) [23] . The combination of these two methods can reduce the drawbacks of each method if the FTA is used to determine the root causes and the FMEA is applied to specify the severity, occurrence, and detection numbers [24] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is widely elaborated, eg, previous studies. 3,4 In the field of functional safety, the FTA method is elaborated according to EN 61508 in Rausand and Høyland, 5 for automotive is mentioned in Mader et al 6 Unlike ISO 26262, the standards EN 61508, IEC 61511 do not have the concept of multiple failures. Therefore, failure rates associated with multiple failures, such as failure rates λ FMPF DP and λ MPF L , do not appear anywhere in the calculation examples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%