2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FSM-based conformance testing methods: A survey annotated with experimental evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
81
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…4) will have no effect. Detailed comparisons involving HSI and other methods can be found in (Dorofeeva et al 2010;Endo and Simao 2013). Another method which is similar to the method we propose is the SC method (Petrenko and Yevtushenko 2005) (see also Sect.…”
Section: Threats To Validity and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4) will have no effect. Detailed comparisons involving HSI and other methods can be found in (Dorofeeva et al 2010;Endo and Simao 2013). Another method which is similar to the method we propose is the SC method (Petrenko and Yevtushenko 2005) (see also Sect.…”
Section: Threats To Validity and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have investigated means to reduce the test set, while keeping the same properties. Experimental results on test set sizes comparing the existing methods can be found in (Dorofeeva et al 2010;Endo and Simao 2013). These studies show that the recent methods (H and SPY) are able to produce test sets smaller than the traditional ones (W, Wp, and HSI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is rather difficult to mechanically reproduce the situations corresponding to all exception handling and timeout mechanisms in real environment and test whether the corresponding reactions for all the inputs are carried out correctly. Therefore, a lot of methods for conformance testing of communication protocols modeled as FSMs have been developed, especially in 1980s and 1990s (for survey, see [21,40,45,69]). Those testing methods for FSMs are classified as active testing.…”
Section: Active Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, notions similar to the nucleus of an FSM and to distinguishing suffixes of states, which are used to define characteristic samples, are also used in [12,16]. The connection between conformance testing and regular inference is made explicit in [8] and [32] describes how an active learning algorithm can be used for fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%