Fruittree leafroller: Control of a Population Tolerant to Diazinon12

Madsen, Harold F.; Carty, B. E.

doi:10.1093/jee/70.5.615

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Leafroller control in commercial apple orchards in British Columbia has involved the use of organophosphate insecticides since the 1960s, with diazinon and azinphosmethyl the most widely used (Madsen 1969). Neonate larvae of fruittree leafroller were first reported to be resistant to diazinon in 1977 (Madsen and Carty 1977) and to azinphosmethyl in the early 1980s (Vakenti et al 1984). Cossentine and Jensen (1991) reported that LD 50 values for azinphosmethyl of male A. argyrospila caught in pheromone traps from 1986 to 1988 were similar to those reported by Vakenti et al (1984), and generally reflected the success of control measures in individual orchards.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 68%

“…The development of resistance to organophosphate insecticides in univoltine leafrollers in the Okanagan Valley has made it essential to change insecticides to achieve adequate control. Since the first report of resistance to diazinon in 1975 (Madsen and Carty 1977), and subsequent documentation of resistance to azinphosmethyl in the early 1980s (Vakenti et al 1984), several different materials have been recommended for leafroller control, including methidathion and Bacillus thuringiensis (Anonymous 1998). Growers are instructed to avoid application of diazinon or azinphosmethyl for leafroller control in orchards where there have been control problems in past years.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Variation in response to insecticides in two species of univoltine leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Populations of fruittree leafroller, Archips argyrospila (Walker), and European leafroller, Archips rosana L., were obtained from eight sites in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia, and assayed for their responses to five insecticides using a leaf-disk bioassay and neonate larvae. Lethal concentration ratios (LCR values) were calculated for all populations compared with the most susceptible strain, and significant variation was detected in both species. LCR values ranged from 1.04 to 9.06 for azinphosmethyl, from 1.29 to 53.15 for tebufenozide (Confirm®), from 1.85 to 24.69 for methoxyfenozide (Intrepid®), from 1.59 to 2291.4 for indoxacarb (Avaunt®), and from 1.92 to 1.98 for spinosad (Success®). Methoxy fenozide was approximately 100-fold more toxic to neonate leafrollers than was tebufenozide, and spinosad was the most toxic of all materials tested. Correlation analysis indicated that there was cross-resistance between azinphosmethyl and tebufenozide. At the LC50 level, the responses of the two species were not significantly different for each insecticide. Analysis of equivalency and parallelism of dose-response lines revealed that A. argyrospila and A. rosana had equivalent responses to azinphosmethyl. LC50 values for the response of A. argyrospila to azinphosmethyl were not different from values obtained almost 20 years earlier. Cross-resistance between azinphosmethyl and tebufenozide suggests that resistance management for these two species of univoltine leafrollers should not include rotation of azinphosmethyl and benzoylhydrazine insect-growth regulators. The high level of resistance to indoxacarb found in one population indicates that baseline tolerance screening is desirable before indoxacarb is introduced for use in Canadian orchards.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 68%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation in response to insecticides in two species of univoltine leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A. argyrospila has developed resistance to the organophosphate insecticides diazinon (Madsen & Carty, 1977) and azinphosmethyl (Vakenti et al, 1984) in parts of the Okanagan valley. These findings indicate that A. rosana should be more successful in exploiting a wider host range than are A. argyrospila.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A. argyrospila may therefore be the dominant species only under conditions where they have some other biological advantage, such as resistance to insecticides. A. argyrospila has developed resistance to the organophosphate insecticides diazinon (Madsen & Carty, 1977) and azinphosmethyl (Vakenti et al, 1984) in parts of the Okanagan valley. There have been no reports of insecticide resistance in A. rosana or in the two bivoltine species in British Columbia.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Larval performance of two leafroller species on known and potential hosts

Smirle

1993

Entomologia Exp Applicata

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two univoltine leafroller species, Archips argyrospila Walker and Archips rosana L., were reared from eclosion to adulthood on known or potential host plants. Both species were able to complete development on eight of the ten plants tested, the exceptions being apricot and peach. Rates of development differed among hosts, and indicated a range of host suitability. Differences in female pupal weights were apparent following the different rearing treatments, but these did not correlate with subsequent female fecundity. When development was compared between the two leafroller species, A. rosana had higher survivorship, more rapid development and higher female fecundity than did A. argyrospila, regardless of host. These findings indicate that A. rosana may successfully exploit a wider host range than does A. argyrospila. Comparisons of survivorship and developmental rates among hosts for each species of leafroller suggest that both species may have the potential for host-range expansion.

show abstract

“…Várela et al (1993) reported on codling moth populations resistant to azinphosmethyl. Just as pesticide resistance in leafrollers has jeopardized stability of IPM programs in the eastern U.S. (Knight and Hull, 1989;Madsen and Carty, 1977;Reissig et al, 1986), resistance in codling moth threatens the stability of OP-based IPM programs in the west (Brunner, 1991;Croft and Hoyt, 1978), especially since potential alternative controls, such as synthetic pyrethroids, carbamates, or IGRs, may not be options because of cross-tolerance of resistant pest populations (S. C. Welter, personal communication).…”

Section: Pesticide Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated pest management in tree fruit crops

Brunner

1994

Food Reviews International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fruittree leafroller: Control of a Population Tolerant to Diazinon12

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Variation in response to insecticides in two species of univoltine leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Variation in response to insecticides in two species of univoltine leafrollers (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Larval performance of two leafroller species on known and potential hosts

Integrated pest management in tree fruit crops

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About