Fruit Quality of Sweet Cherry Cultivars Grafted on Four Different Rootstocks

Simon, G.; Hrotkó, K.; Magyar, L.

doi:10.17660/actahortic.2004.658.53

Cited by 19 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Yield efficiencies of sweet cherry trees grafted on new Mahaleb cherry rootstocks were significantly higher than those on Mazzard rootstock (Table 3), which implies that this index is not positively correlated with tree vigour, as was observed by other authors (Simon et al 2004;Balmer 2008;Godini et al 2008;Grzyb et al 2008;Hrotkó et al 2009). The current experiment found that higher yield efficiency for trees on Mahaleb cherry rootstocks No.…”

Section: Growth and Yieldsupporting

confidence: 50%

“…Furthermore, the experiments of other authors (Simon et al 2004;Godini et al 2008) confirm that trees budded on Mahaleb cherry cv. SL64 produced higher crop.…”

Section: Growth and Yieldmentioning

confidence: 56%

“…According to many authors (Simon et al 2004;Bujdoso, Hrotkó 2005;Hrotkó 2007;Gratacos et al 2008;Stachowiak 2012) sweet cherry trees budded on weakly growing rootstocks blossom and fruit more abundantly than trees budded on stronger growing rootstocks. It is also confirmed by the results of the conducted experiment ( (Table 2).…”

Section: Growth and Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Influence of rootstocks on different sweet cherry cultivars and accumulation of heavy metals in leaves and fruit

Stachowiak¹,

Bosiacki²,

Świerczyński³

et al. 2015

Hort. Sci. (Prague)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two seedling rootstocks of Mahaleb cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) from a German type cv. Alpruna marked as No. 2 and No. 6 were selected for their semi-dwarfing properties from biotypes growing at the Rural Experimental Station in Baranowo belonging to the University of Life Sciences in Poznan, Poland. In an orchard experiment in 2012-2013, growth and yield of eight-and nine-year old trees of the cvs Regina, Summit and Vanda were studied. These cultivars were grafted on Mahaleb cherry No. 2 and No. 6 and were compared to the control rootstock Mazzard (Prunus avium L.) cv. Alkavo. The Mahaleb cherry biotypes significantly decreased the trunk cross-sectional area and the crown volume of the trees. The cultivars grafted on Mahaleb cherry biotypes No. 2 and No. 6 had more flowers and they gave a higher yield. The yield efficiency for cultivars grafted on these rootstocks was higher than for rootstock Mazzard. Significant differences of the concentration of the elements were found for Fe, Cu, Zn in fruit and for Fe, Cu and Cr in leaves. Presence of Pb and Cr was not detected in sweet cherry fruit.

show abstract

Section: Growth and Yieldsupporting

confidence: 50%

“…Furthermore, the experiments of other authors (Simon et al 2004;Godini et al 2008) confirm that trees budded on Mahaleb cherry cv. SL64 produced higher crop.…”

Section: Growth and Yieldmentioning

confidence: 56%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of rootstocks on different sweet cherry cultivars and accumulation of heavy metals in leaves and fruit

Stachowiak¹,

Bosiacki²,

Świerczyński³

et al. 2015

Hort. Sci. (Prague)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is hypothesis that dwarfing rootstocks, because of smaller roots, are exposed to stress and cause cracking Hovland and Sekse 2004;Simon et al 2004;Khadivi-Khub 2009).…”

Section: Osmotic Concentrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physiological and genetic factors influencing fruit cracking

Khadivi

2014

Acta Physiol Plant

136

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the main disorders that widely limit fruit quality and quantity is fruit cracking or splitting that is observed on the fruit skin and flesh in the preharvest phase. Besides, cracking can occur during postharvest in some fruits, mostly attributable to the environmental conditions of storage. Value of cracked fruits is reduced and these fruits are not marketable because of the poor fruit quality. Many fruits such as apple, sweet cherry, grape, plum, pomegranate, grape, persimmon, litchi, avocado, pistachio, citrus, banana as well as tomato can crack or split. There are many factors that influence fruit cracking. In this work, genetic, morphological, environmental and physiological aspects of fruit cracking are reviewed. Under the same environmental conditions, fruits from different cultivars show differences in cracking susceptibility. Some correlations have been observed between susceptibility of fruit cracking and some fruit traits (fruit shape, fruit size, fruit firmness; anatomy and strength of the fruit skin, stomata in fruit skin, cuticular properties, osmotic concentration, water capacity of the fruit pulp and growth stage of the fruit). Also, orchard management (such as irrigation and nutrition) and environmental condition (such as temperature, wind and light) can influence fruit cracking. Besides, fruit cracking is quantitative trait and is controlled by several genes. The best way to reduce fruit cracking at present would be a suitable orchard management that takes into account and try to minimize stress of the water, nutrition and physiological factors that contribute to fruit cracking. Also, the most resistant cultivars to fruit cracking that have desirable fruit quality can be selected for cultivation.

show abstract

“…The rootstock used for growing fruit trees affects many traits of trees and fruits, such as tree vigor (Balmer 2008), flower bud induction and regular bearing (Koutinas et al 2010), productivity index (Bielicki and Rozpara 2010), fruit mass (Gratacós et al 2008), or cracking susceptibility (Brüggenwirth and Knoche 2016). Moreover, it also has an impact on such fruit characteristics as: size, firmness, soluble solids content, acidity, color (fruit, peduncle) and taste (Simon et al 2004;Gratacós et al 2008; Communicated by Jeong Hee Choi. Kankaya et al 2008); rootstock can affect both harvest and postharvest periods.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of sweet cherry fruit quality after short-term storage in relation to the rootstock

Dziedzic

Błaszczyk

2019

Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fruits of the sweet cherry cultivar 'Regina' collected from trees growing on seven rootstocks were stored in a cold room at 2 °C with a normal (NA) and controlled atmosphere (15% and 20% CO 2 and 5% O 2-CA1 and CA2) for 2 weeks. The rootstocks on which the trees grew and the storage conditions significantly affected all fruit parameters tested during both years of the experiment. Fruit from Damil rootstock exhibited higher mean firmness than fruit from Colt rootstock. The effect of rootstocks on the value of soluble solids content (SSC) varied, wherein the fruits from Tabel Edabriz and Damil were characterized by high SSC mean content. The organic acids content (TA) was significantly lower after storage than during harvest time. Fruits from Tabel Edabriz trees were characterized by faster ripening, as was evident by the higher SSC to TA ratio. The amount of mass lost depended significantly and only on the storage conditions-sweet cherries from both CA combinations had the lowest mass losses. The percentage of fruits showing disease symptoms was largely dependent on the weather conditions in the orchard the year before the fruit harvest, as well as atmosphere composition and RH during fruit storage. Cold storage conditions with a high (20%) CO 2 content are recommended for the short-term storage of sweet cherry fruits because they preserve fruit quality parameters: a low decrease in firmness, maintenance of a high SSC/TA ratio, a low percent of fungal infections, and good preservation of green color in the peduncle.

show abstract

Fruit Quality of Sweet Cherry Cultivars Grafted on Four Different Rootstocks

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Influence of rootstocks on different sweet cherry cultivars and accumulation of heavy metals in leaves and fruit

Influence of rootstocks on different sweet cherry cultivars and accumulation of heavy metals in leaves and fruit

Physiological and genetic factors influencing fruit cracking

Evaluation of sweet cherry fruit quality after short-term storage in relation to the rootstock

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About