2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03658-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fruit quality and nutritional analysis in ‘Pêra’ orange as affected by soil available water and different rootstocks

Abstract: The market of citrus fruits for fresh consumption is greatly influenced by the external aspect of the fruit, which needs to meet certain quality requirements. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate fruit characteristics and leaf concentrations of nutrients, associating them with soil available water, for combinations of 'Pêra' orange with five different rootstocks, in two planting systems [conventional seedlings and direct seeding (DS) of rootstocks] in soil without subsoiling, in two sampling periods (wet an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in the C Las-infected fruit led to abnormal growth development that regulated the fruit shape to a less oblate, typical of sweet oranges. The size and weight of the Pera sweet orange fruit found in our study were similar to those reported for this cultivar under field conditions ( Figure 5 ) [ 67 ]. Further investigation is certainly needed to evaluate the performance of the STX IA transgenic plants under field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The changes in the C Las-infected fruit led to abnormal growth development that regulated the fruit shape to a less oblate, typical of sweet oranges. The size and weight of the Pera sweet orange fruit found in our study were similar to those reported for this cultivar under field conditions ( Figure 5 ) [ 67 ]. Further investigation is certainly needed to evaluate the performance of the STX IA transgenic plants under field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%