2005
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.6.753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fruit load and branch ring-barking affect carbon allocation and photosynthesis of leaf and fruit of Coffea arabica in the field

Abstract: Increasing fruit load (from no berries present to 25, 50 and 100% of the initial fruit load) significantly decreased branch growth on 5-year-old coffee (Coffea arabica L.) trees of the dwarf cultivar 'Costa Rica 95', during their third production cycle. Ring-barking the branches further reduced their growth. Berry dry mass at harvest was significantly reduced by increasing fruit load. Dry matter allocation to berries was four times that allocated to branch growth during the cycle. Branch dieback and berry drop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
67
5
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
19
67
5
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Kumar and Tieszen (1976) estimated that green coffee berries could provide 100 % of their maintenance requirements and up to 30 % of their growth requirements through their own photosynthetic activity. In a more recent study, it was estimated that berries could produce about 30 % of their own daily respiration costs and contributed to approximately 12 % of their total carbon requirements (Vaast et al, 2005). Therefore, even if large long distance carbohydrate transfers occur in coffee trees (Cannell, 1971), the contribution of the pericarp to the coffee bean development is far from negligible.…”
Section: Pericarpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar and Tieszen (1976) estimated that green coffee berries could provide 100 % of their maintenance requirements and up to 30 % of their growth requirements through their own photosynthetic activity. In a more recent study, it was estimated that berries could produce about 30 % of their own daily respiration costs and contributed to approximately 12 % of their total carbon requirements (Vaast et al, 2005). Therefore, even if large long distance carbohydrate transfers occur in coffee trees (Cannell, 1971), the contribution of the pericarp to the coffee bean development is far from negligible.…”
Section: Pericarpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para os cafeeiros mantidos a pleno sol, foi verificada maior concentração de carga de frutificação no terço médio da copa dos cafeeiros; para os cafeeiros arborizados, o maior pegamento de frutos foi observado no terço superior. Segundo Vaast et al (2005), em estudo realizado com cafeeiros de cinco anos de idade, cv. Costa Rica 95, o transporte de fotoassimilados para os frutos foi quatro vezes superior ao observado para os ramos durante o terceiro ciclo de produção da cultura.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Since fruit production is the strongest carbohydrate sink in C. arabica (Cannell, 1976) and competes with vegetative growth (Amaral, Matta, & Rena, 2001; DaMatta et al., 2007, 2008; Vaast et al., 2005), the lack of fruiting in the heat treatments should theoretically result in more NSC available for growth, storage, metabolic maintenance, and repair (Chapin, Schulze, & Mooney, 1990; Dietze et al., 2014; Kozlowski, 1992). This helps elucidate the patterns in total NSC and starch of the 45‐min group (Figure 5a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that even short heat events can have substantial impacts on carbon gain (Filewod & Thomas, 2014), the predicted fluctuations in the duration of summer heat waves (Della‐Marta, Haylock, Luterbacher, & Wanner, 2007), and the paucity of studies manipulating heat stress duration, research on the effects of heat stress duration on physiological recovery and NSC dynamics is needed. NSC dynamics in C. arabica are tightly linked to sink demand from vegetative and reproductive growth (Chaves, Martins, Batista, Celin, & DaMatta, 2012; Génard et al., 2008; Ramalho et al., 2013), and many studies have investigated whether NSC levels regulate C. arabica photosynthesis (Batista et al., 2011; DaMatta et al., 2016; Franck, Vaast, Génard, & Dauzat, 2006; Ronchi et al., 2006; Vaast, Angrand, Franck, Dauzat, & Génard, 2005). However, to our knowledge, no study has investigated the impacts of heat stress‐induced reductions in photosynthesis as a cause rather than a consequence of NSC dynamics in C. arabica .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%