2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fruit and Vegetable Shopping Practices and Social Support Scales: A Validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, families shopping only once a month were not purchasing a large quantity of fresh FV items. FV shopping practices, social support for purchasing FV [29], parent outcome expectancies for purchasing FV [30], and FV pantry management practices [31] were correlated with home FV availability. When combined in the same predictive model and controlling for possible demographic confounders, only social support for purchasing FV predicted home FV availability [32].…”
Section: Mediating Variables: Influences On Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, families shopping only once a month were not purchasing a large quantity of fresh FV items. FV shopping practices, social support for purchasing FV [29], parent outcome expectancies for purchasing FV [30], and FV pantry management practices [31] were correlated with home FV availability. When combined in the same predictive model and controlling for possible demographic confounders, only social support for purchasing FV predicted home FV availability [32].…”
Section: Mediating Variables: Influences On Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enabling adult food shoppers (with children at home) to purchase more fruit, 100% juice, and vegetables should increase home availability, and thereby children’s consumption. Qualitative research suggested a variety of factors may influence the purchase of fruit, 100% juice, and vegetables and thereby increase their availability in the home, including: frequency of food shopping (3); purchase and comparative purchase (eg, such as fresh vs other); fruit, 100% juice, and vegetable outcome expectancies (ie, the perceived benefits and costs of purchasing fruit, 100% juice, and vegetables) (4); home food pantry management practices (5); family social support for purchasing (6); and food shopping practices (7). The Figure provides a conceptual model of how these variables could logically be interrelated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of construct validity, other psychometric properties of the communication constructs were not evaluated as part of the current study. However the instrument was adapted from previously validated constructs (Baranowski et al, 2006). Another limitation is that there is no clear linkage between parent and ECE center providers’ influence on food consumption behaviors of the preschool children which needs to be examined in future studies (Briley & McAllaster 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project staff sent the surveys home to the consenting parents. Communication between parent and child was assessed using four questions for each of the FVWG adapted from previously validated questionnaires (Baranowski et al 2006). These four questions asked the parents about their child’s approval of packing FVWG foods in the sack lunches; how often the child has asked the parent regarding packing FVWG foods in the sack lunches; child reminded parents to buy FVWG foods for his or her sack lunches; and frequency of child talking about FVWG foods for his or her sack lunch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%