2023
DOI: 10.1111/btp.13234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frugivory and seed dispersal in the Cerrado: Network structure and defaunation effects

Abstract: Seed dispersal is a key process for ecosystem functioning, especially in tropical environments, where it has profound ecological and evolutionary repercussions on the individual (Jordano et al., 2007), population ), community (Levine & Murrell, 2003), ecosystem (Rogers et al., 2021, and landscape (Villar et al., 2021) levels. One of the key elements for seed dispersal is the size of the interacting agents. Large plants usually have large seeds (Moles et al., 2005;Moles & Westoby, 2006;Thompson & Rabinowitz, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our lower species richness and abundance of birds in the forest may also be due to a lower survey completeness since the mist-nets only capture a subset of the community, especially small understory birds (Thiel et al, 2021). However, because small birds usually have a higher proportion of interactions in dispersal networks than other species (Béllo Carvalho et al, 2023;Carreira et al, 2020), our results may be representative of seed dispersers involved in interactions between both habitats. Furthermore, although bird species richness is commonly used to assess forest recovery, this indicator is not useful for discerning variations in F I G U R E 4 Rank-abundance curves for seed disperser communities of (a) birds, (b) bats, and (c) terrestrial mammals between forest and bracken-dominated areas.…”
Section: Birdsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our lower species richness and abundance of birds in the forest may also be due to a lower survey completeness since the mist-nets only capture a subset of the community, especially small understory birds (Thiel et al, 2021). However, because small birds usually have a higher proportion of interactions in dispersal networks than other species (Béllo Carvalho et al, 2023;Carreira et al, 2020), our results may be representative of seed dispersers involved in interactions between both habitats. Furthermore, although bird species richness is commonly used to assess forest recovery, this indicator is not useful for discerning variations in F I G U R E 4 Rank-abundance curves for seed disperser communities of (a) birds, (b) bats, and (c) terrestrial mammals between forest and bracken-dominated areas.…”
Section: Birdsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the low abundance, these species store most of the carbon stocks of trees, reinforcing the importance of animals for the dispersal of these species in the CE and that CE presents a more moderate loss of animal dispersers when compared with RF and SDTF_SD (Carvalho et al, 2023).…”
Section: Carbon Storage By Dispersal Mode Across Vegetation Typesmentioning
confidence: 90%