Frugivores and Fruit Syndromes: Differences in Patterns at the Genus and Species Level

Abstract

Fischer, K. E. and Chapman, C. A. 1993. Frugivores and fruit syndromes: differences in patterns at the genus and species level.-Oikos 66: 472-482. Comparative studies have suggested that fruit traits, such as color, size, and protection, have evolved as covarying character complexes ("dispersal syndromes") in response to selection by frugivorous dispersers. However, many comparative studies of disperser-specific syndromes have used species as sampling units, a method which implicitly assumes that character complexes evolve de novo in each species. This approach overestimates the number of times a character complex has evolved because covariation that results from common ancestry (plesiomorphy) is confounded with covariation across independent lineages (convergence). We compiled data on fleshy fruit traits from five regional floras to test the hypothesis that fruit traits form character complexes which covary independently of phylogeny (i.e. across lineages). Our results suggest that such character complexes are rare, and that analyses of covariation among these character complexes are extremely sensitive to the investigator's choice of sampling unit. When syndromes derived from observations of the foraging behavior of frugivores are analyzed using species as sampling units, our data show significant associations among traits at four out of five locations. In contrast, when genera are used as sampling units, there is no significant association among traits at any of the sites. Theories of coevolution between fruits and frugivores have proposed that fruit morphology is a response to selective pressures exerted by frugivorous birds and mammals. If these frugivores have shaped fruit morphology into dispersal-related character complexes or syndromes, then traits associated with a syndrome should be absent or much reduced in frequency in regions lacking that guild of dispersers. To test this prediction, we examined the flora of New Guinea, which lacks primates and other diurnal mammalian frugivores, and found no difference in the frequency of traits associated with dispersal by diurnal mammals.

Dispersers shape fruit diversity in Ficus (Moraceae)

“…This result is fundamentally different from those of other studies, in which authors addressed the evolution of individual fruit traits associated with different types of frugivores (13). Although other hypotheses also can explain the correlated evolution of a couple of fruit traits (18,(37)(38)(39), only the dispersalsyndrome hypothesis can account parsimoniously for the correlated evolution of so many traits.…”

“…Despite the intuitive appeal of dispersal syndromes, their existence has become increasingly controversial because studies that use phylogenetic methods have failed to detect them (18)(19)(20), with the possible exceptions of one or two isolated traits (13,21). This failure raises a paradox: Frugivores strongly affect plant fitness (2, 4) but do not appear to be strong selective agents in driving the evolution of fruit traits (10,13).…”

Padrões de floração e frutificação de árvores da Amazônia Maranhense

“…As espécies foram separadas de acordo com seus mecanismos de dispersão, em zoocóricas, anemocóricas e autocóricas, considerando-se a morfologia dos frutos ou a literatura (Pijl, 1982;Roosmalen, 1985;Fischer & Chapman, 1993) …”

Geographic patterns in fruit colour diversity: do leaves constrain the colour of fleshy fruits?

“…This hypothesis has been criticised as few animals tend to specialise on particular fruits and many fruit traits are strongly determined by phylogeny (Herrera 1985;Fischer and Chapman 1993;see Waser et al 1996; Johnson and Steiner 2000 for pollination syndromes). However, recent phylogenetically controlled studies show that fruit colour is one of the most important fruit traits reflecting differential food selection by distinct frugivore assemblages (Voigt et al 2004;Lomáscolo et al 2008).…”