2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69170-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frugal Sensor Assignment

Abstract: When a sensor network is deployed in the field it is typically required to support multiple simultaneous missions, which may start and finish at different times. Schemes that match sensor resources to mission demands thus become necessary. In this paper, we consider new sensor-assignment problems motivated by frugality, i.e., the conservation of resources, for both static and dynamic settings. In general, the problems we study are NP-hard even to approximate, and so we focus on heuristic algorithms that perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also defined a relaxed version of the problem and found the upper bound for it. The results indicated that the overall profit obtained with our method was 130% and 11% higher than those with the greedy method and the previous method [7] that did not use path information. Moreover, the percentage of live nodes was higher than that with the other approaches.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…We also defined a relaxed version of the problem and found the upper bound for it. The results indicated that the overall profit obtained with our method was 130% and 11% higher than those with the greedy method and the previous method [7] that did not use path information. Moreover, the percentage of live nodes was higher than that with the other approaches.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Johnson et al [10] defined new sensor-assignment problems motivated by frugality and conservation of resources, in both static and dynamic settings. They proposed an efferent scheme for matching sense resources to missions, and evaluated the scheme through simulations.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past sensor-task assignment problems in wireless sensor networks have been studied mainly using simplified models in which utility from multiple sensors is assumed to combine additively [3,8,11]. [8] uses distributed approaches assign individual sensors to tasks, assuming additive utility and no competition for the same sensing resources between tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] uses distributed approaches assign individual sensors to tasks, assuming additive utility and no competition for the same sensing resources between tasks. A problem variant motivated by frugality and conservation of resources is addressed in [11]. In this paper, we consider more complex models to evaluate the utility of a bundle of sensors, and show how such problems can be solved, even based on inexact sensor location information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%