2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frozen Virtual Natural Orbitals for Coupled-Cluster Linear-Response Theory

Abstract: The frozen-virtual natural-orbital (NO) approach, whereby the unoccupied-orbital space is constructed using a correlated density such as that from many-body perturbation theory, has proven to yield compact wave functions for determining ground-state correlation energies and associated properties, with corresponding occupation numbers providing a guide to the truncation of the virtual space. In this work this approach is tested for the first time for the calculation of higher-order response properties, particul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we note that computational savings can be obtained by simply truncating the virtual orbital space in the canonical orbital basis. 50,51 In a previous publication, we have introduced a local framework for calculating CC excitation energies (LoFEx), 49 which provides a general approach for calculating excitation energies at a reduced computational cost. The orbital space in the LoFEx approach is a mixed space containing natural transition orbitals (NTOs) determined from a timedependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) calculation and localized molecular orbitals (LMOs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we note that computational savings can be obtained by simply truncating the virtual orbital space in the canonical orbital basis. 50,51 In a previous publication, we have introduced a local framework for calculating CC excitation energies (LoFEx), 49 which provides a general approach for calculating excitation energies at a reduced computational cost. The orbital space in the LoFEx approach is a mixed space containing natural transition orbitals (NTOs) determined from a timedependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) calculation and localized molecular orbitals (LMOs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the FVNO method has been used successfully within the context of coupled‐cluster theory for correlation energies, ionization energies, geometry optimizations, and so forth, its utility for response properties was only recently considered, specifically in the context of dynamic polarizabilities. Figure compare the impact of freezing virtual orbitals on CCSD correlation energies vs. polarizabilities (using hydrogen peroxide as an example system), where CMOs are removed starting from the highest‐energy orbitals and virtual NOs starting from the lowest occupation numbers.…”
Section: Reduced Scaling: Localization Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Figure b reveals a complete reversal of this trend for polarizabilities: the virtual NOs that play an insignificant role in describing electron correlation can be essential for describing the response to the electric field; on the other hand, due in part to fortuitous error cancellations, high‐energy CMOs play no role in this regard, a finding consistent with those of Sundholm and co‐workers . Similar trends can be observed for molecules such as dimethylallene, and methyloxirane (as well as these compounds interacting with explicit solvent molecules) and with diffuse‐augmented basis sets like aDZ, d‐aDZ, aTZ, and so forth …”
Section: Reduced Scaling: Localization Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50,51 Although the literature of local correlation methods is intensively growing, applications to excited states are relatively scarce. The first excited-state local approach was proposed by Crawford et al, 52,53 who generalized the ground-state local CCSD method of Werner and co-workers 54 to EOM-CCSD. Subsequently several excited-state CC methods utilizing local approximations were published by Korona, Schütz, and their associates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, a one-particle density matrix is constructed using a more approximate correlation method, the matrix is diagonalized, and the orbitals with small occupation number, i.e., eigenvalue, are dropped from the resulting NO basis. [67][68][69] While the approach is extensively used for ground-state CCSD and higher-order CC calculations, [70][71][72][73] only a couple of applications have been reported for excited states, 53,74 and, to the best of knowledge, no attempt has been made so far to accelerate CC2 calculations with frozen NO approximations. Motivated by the NO technique, a related approach was recently put forward by one of us for the reduction of the auxiliary function basis set employed in DF methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%