The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2009.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frother persistence: A measure using gas holdup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in froth volume with time combined with the much lower concentration of acetone after a steady state froth height was reached pointed towards the evaporation of acetone with time to concentration levels lower than the minimum concentration expected to delay the coalescence of bubble pairs. This result is consistent with the relatively volatile nature of acetone, which was found to be similar to some alcohols as reported by Azgomi et al [3]. The second aspect studied is the contribution of the chemistry of the continuous phase to the foaming properties of the dispersion (Table 1).…”
Section: Effect Of Residual Acetone On Foamingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The decrease in froth volume with time combined with the much lower concentration of acetone after a steady state froth height was reached pointed towards the evaporation of acetone with time to concentration levels lower than the minimum concentration expected to delay the coalescence of bubble pairs. This result is consistent with the relatively volatile nature of acetone, which was found to be similar to some alcohols as reported by Azgomi et al [3]. The second aspect studied is the contribution of the chemistry of the continuous phase to the foaming properties of the dispersion (Table 1).…”
Section: Effect Of Residual Acetone On Foamingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…et al [9] that addition of frother increased the gas holdup while Azgomi et al [10] showed that increasing gas velocity decreased the persistence of frother and gas hold up. Also Zhou et al [11] indicates that the ratio of gas holdup is lower in the presence of Dowfroth 250 than MIBC.…”
Section: Parameters and Gas Holdup In Column Flotation 49mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of frother concentration on gas holdup had been studied by some of authors [7][8][9][10]. It was reported by Shukla et al [7], Matiolo et al [8], and Ityokumbul …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Alcohol frothers produce froths that are relatively shallow and "dry" (i.e. carry less water) [35] and have low persistence [36]. MIBC (methyl isobutyl carbinol) is the best-known frother in this group.…”
Section: Effect Of Frothers On Flotation Sub-processesmentioning
confidence: 99%