2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
58
4
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, there has been a concordance of findings on the functional anatomy of the CNV explored with task-based fMRI (e.g., see Gomez et al, 2007;Lutcke et al, 2009;Scheibe et al, 2010)], but rarely (see Nagai et al, 2004) a connection has been sought between anticipatory signals such as the CNV and spontaneously occurring SCPs, which are known to influence information processing (e.g., see Birbaumer et al, 1990;Lakatos et al, 2008;Monto et al, 2008;Vanhatalo et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Restless Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, there has been a concordance of findings on the functional anatomy of the CNV explored with task-based fMRI (e.g., see Gomez et al, 2007;Lutcke et al, 2009;Scheibe et al, 2010)], but rarely (see Nagai et al, 2004) a connection has been sought between anticipatory signals such as the CNV and spontaneously occurring SCPs, which are known to influence information processing (e.g., see Birbaumer et al, 1990;Lakatos et al, 2008;Monto et al, 2008;Vanhatalo et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Restless Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modality-specific relay nuclei act as gates that can be opened non-selectively by the brainstem reticular formation and can be closed selectively by the (pre)frontal cortex. Some studies could not find modality-specific distributions of SPN (Böcker et al, 1994, Bastiaansen and, and pointed towards influences of supramodal parietal attention-shifting processes (Gomez et al, 2007). SPN has also been considered an indicator of response timing and attention (Brunia and van Boxtel, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The CNV is a complex process with two subcomponents described. The initial component reflects orientation to the warning stimulus (early CNV) (Weerts and Lang, 1973), whereas the later component indexes anticipation of the imperative stimulus (Weerts and Lang, 1973), including motor preparation for the response (late CNV) (Loveless and Sanford, 1974), sensory anticipation (Brunia et al, 1999, Gómez et al, 2003 and the activation of the attentionally-related fronto-parietal networks (Gómez et al, 2007, Fan et al, 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%