Frontline Health Care Workers’ Mental Health and Well-Being During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Interviews and Social Media Data

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on fractures in health care systems worldwide and continues to have a significant impact, particularly in relation to the health care workforce. Frontline staff have been exposed to unprecedented strain, and delivering care during the pandemic has affected their safety, mental health, and well-being. Objective This study aimed to explore the experiences of health care workers (HCWs) delivering care in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic to understand their well-being needs, experiences, and strategies used to maintain well-being (at individual and organizational levels). Methods We analyzed 94 telephone interviews with HCWs and 2000 tweets about HCWs’ mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results The results were grouped under 6 themes: redeployment, clinical work, and sense of duty; well-being support and HCW’s coping strategies; negative mental health effects; organizational support; social network and support; and public and government support. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the need for open conversations, where staff’s well-being needs and the strategies they adopted can be shared and encouraged, rather than implementing top-down psychological interventions alone. At the macro level, the findings also highlighted the impact on HCW’s well-being of public and government support as well as the need to ensure protection through personal protective equipment, testing, and vaccines for frontline workers.

Assessing the Impact of Evidence-Based Mental Health Guidance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Qualitative Evaluation

“…Survey response rates were very low, despite active reminders. These are perhaps explained by a level of COVID-19 fatigue or burnout [ 87 , 88 ] at the time of the survey. In addition, each site used their existing email databases for staff.…”

What do we have here? A Systematic Review of Mental Health Policy in Colombia

“…Due to the length of the data extracted, an appropriate big qualitative data analysis method was applied. The Collaborative and Digital Analysis of Big Qual Data in Time Sensitive Contexts (LISTEN) method connects the human insight of participatory analysis methods, and the precision and agility of digital analysis software (17). This analysis consists of iterative cycles of intercalating team discussions and the use of digital text and discourse analytics tools.…”

Exploring perspectives of stigma and discrimination among people with lived experience of mental health conditions: a co-produced qualitative study

“…Beginning analysis by digitally identifying key topics present in the data reduces potential researcher bias, while following this structured process with an in-depth manual exploration mitigates limitations of analysis software. 19 These initial summaries were then refined further by two researchers (PCG, HL), through considering potential latent themes and groupings within these data (07/2022). The emerging results synthesis was reviewed and refined in a workshop with four peer researchers (GM, ML, KV, CS) (09/2022).…”