2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting

Abstract: The interest on forecasting Value at Risk (VaR) has been growing over the last two decades due to the practical relevance of this risk measure for financial and insurance institutions. Furthermore, VaR forecasts are often used as a battleground when alternative models are fitted to represent the dynamic evolution of time series of financial returns. There is a vast amount of alternative methods for constructing and evaluating VaR forecasts. In this paper, we survey the new benchmarks proposed in the recent lit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 232 publications
(197 reference statements)
0
71
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The asymmetric power ARCH (APARCH) model developed by Ding, Granger, and Engle (1993) is considered as highly flexible, since it can nest a large variety of other GARCH-type models. Some authors (see Diamandis, Drakos, Kouretas, & Zarangas, 2011;Giot & Laurent, 2003;Nieto & Ruiz, 2016;Rodríguez & Ruiz, 2012) suggest measuring the VaR using asymmetric models, such as APARCH to cope with different responses of the volatility to negative and positive shocks. The fractionally integrated version of this model (FIAPARCH) is not recommended in this context, because incorporating a long-memory effect in the volatility while computing the VaR is against the Basel accords, which requires short-run forecasts (Nieto & Ruiz, 2016).…”
Section: Regime-switching Aparch Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The asymmetric power ARCH (APARCH) model developed by Ding, Granger, and Engle (1993) is considered as highly flexible, since it can nest a large variety of other GARCH-type models. Some authors (see Diamandis, Drakos, Kouretas, & Zarangas, 2011;Giot & Laurent, 2003;Nieto & Ruiz, 2016;Rodríguez & Ruiz, 2012) suggest measuring the VaR using asymmetric models, such as APARCH to cope with different responses of the volatility to negative and positive shocks. The fractionally integrated version of this model (FIAPARCH) is not recommended in this context, because incorporating a long-memory effect in the volatility while computing the VaR is against the Basel accords, which requires short-run forecasts (Nieto & Ruiz, 2016).…”
Section: Regime-switching Aparch Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors (see Diamandis, Drakos, Kouretas, & Zarangas, 2011;Giot & Laurent, 2003;Nieto & Ruiz, 2016;Rodríguez & Ruiz, 2012) suggest measuring the VaR using asymmetric models, such as APARCH to cope with different responses of the volatility to negative and positive shocks. The fractionally integrated version of this model (FIAPARCH) is not recommended in this context, because incorporating a long-memory effect in the volatility while computing the VaR is against the Basel accords, which requires short-run forecasts (Nieto & Ruiz, 2016). These fractionally integrated models provide, however, a good fit compared to their normal versions (Gencer & Demiralay, 2016;Slim, Koubaa, & BenSaïda, 2017).…”
Section: Regime-switching Aparch Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is based on the asymmetric Student t-distribution (hereafter AST 2 See Nelson (1991, p. 352) for a discussion of the problems of the EGARCH model under Student t errors. 3 A recent review by Nieto and Ruiz (2016) suggested that this was the most popular parametric skewed distribution, though it is not the only alternative. I refer the reader to section 3.3.3 of their paper for a detailed discussion of these alternatives and references to applied work.…”
Section: The Asymmetric Student T Dcs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%