2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontier Expansion Sampling: A Method to Accelerate Conformational Search by Identifying Novel Seed Structures for Restart

Abstract: Traditional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have difficulties in tracking the slow molecular motions, at least partially due to the waste of sampling in already sampled regions. Here, we proposed a new enhanced sampling method, frontier expansion sampling (FEXS), to improve the sampling efficiency of molecular simulations by iteratively selecting seed structures diversely distributed at the "frontier" of an already sampled region to initiate new simulations. Different from other enhanced sampling methods, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By circularly running this workflow, the sampling points will gradually escape from the initial potential energy trap. The structure dissimilarity sampling (SDS), parallel cascade selection MD (PaCS-MD), self-avoiding conformational sampling (SACS), complementary coordinates MD (CoCo-MD), and frontier expansion sampling (FES) all belongs to this type. The only difference between these methods is the algorithm they use to find the frontier structures, like the convex hull algorithm used in the FES method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By circularly running this workflow, the sampling points will gradually escape from the initial potential energy trap. The structure dissimilarity sampling (SDS), parallel cascade selection MD (PaCS-MD), self-avoiding conformational sampling (SACS), complementary coordinates MD (CoCo-MD), and frontier expansion sampling (FES) all belongs to this type. The only difference between these methods is the algorithm they use to find the frontier structures, like the convex hull algorithm used in the FES method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…teDA2 belongs to the “splitting strategy” framework for sampling. Still, its strategies, such as driving conformational changes, are very different from other methods (e.g., weighted ensemble path sampling and frontier expansion sampling) in this category. The details of teDA2 have been described in our previous paper .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, energy boosts are exerted on the original potential to reduce the heights of local barriers in accelerated MD (aMD); local minima in the already-sampled region are filled with positive history-dependent Gaussian potentials to avoid redundant sampling in metadynamics and its variants; deep-learning techniques are engaged for dimensionality reduction in VAE, , AE, , and VAMPnet as well as fitting free energy surface or biasing potential in reinforced dynamics, DeepVES and TALOS . Another class of methods enhances the sampling in the less sampled regions by iteratively selecting suitable seed structures as restarting points for new simulations, including but not limited to FEXS, SDS, CoCo MD, and weighted ensemble. , Besides, novel machine-learning-based methods trying to draw independent samples from the equilibrium states in one shot have emerged, exemplified by variational autoregressive networks and Boltzmann generators…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%