2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal Top-Down Signals Increase Coupling of Auditory Low-Frequency Oscillations to Continuous Speech in Human Listeners

Abstract: SummaryHumans show a remarkable ability to understand continuous speech even under adverse listening conditions. This ability critically relies on dynamically updated predictions of incoming sensory information, but exactly how top-down predictions improve speech processing is still unclear. Brain oscillations are a likely mechanism for these top-down predictions [1, 2]. Quasi-rhythmic components in speech are known to entrain low-frequency oscillations in auditory areas [3, 4], and this entrainment increases … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

39
381
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
39
381
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that exogenous stimulation induces a strong phase alignment (Fig. S3 B and C), we speculate that this could have masked frontal contributions (36,37). Our findings are also in line with the proposal that the absolute voltage gradient might be a better predictor of instantaneous cortical excitability than power or phase information of bandlimited signals (38).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that exogenous stimulation induces a strong phase alignment (Fig. S3 B and C), we speculate that this could have masked frontal contributions (36,37). Our findings are also in line with the proposal that the absolute voltage gradient might be a better predictor of instantaneous cortical excitability than power or phase information of bandlimited signals (38).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies in the auditory domain had localized the origin of the low-frequency activity to sensory areas and not frontal regions (13,14,35) but were confounded by the presentation rate, which likely evoked activity (14,35,36). Given that exogenous stimulation induces a strong phase alignment (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To evaluate the performance of the continuous–continuous GCMI estimator (Section 3.1), we consider MEG data collected from a single subject within a continuous design with an auditory speech stimulus [Gross et al, 2013; Park et al, 2015]. For simplicity we focus here on a sensor‐level time‐domain analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI reveals a functional property of the system that might change with different experimental conditions, for example with the rhythmic structure of speech stimuli [Kayser et al, 2015] or spatial attention [Guggenmos et al, 2015; Saproo and Serences, 2010]. Functional connectivity, measured with transfer entropy (DI), has been shown to be affected by the intelligibility of speech [Park et al, 2015]. When considering MI computed in different experimental conditions accurate bias correction is important because bias may not be equal in each condition (for example due to differing numbers of samples, or different degrees of signal autocorrelation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume envelope of speech fluctuates at low frequencies (< 8 Hz), decreasing at boundaries between syllables, words, and phrases. When people listen to speech, neural oscillations in the delta (1-4 Hz) and theta (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) bands become entrained to these fluctuations in volume (1)(2)(3)(4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%