1981
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1981.00510010056010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal Leukotomy Size and Hemispheric Asymmetries on Computerized Tomographic Scans of Schizophrenics With Variable Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lesion size for this data set was found to be much larger than that of modern lesioning techniques; mean (± standard error) volume was 84.6 ± 1.9 ml. Similar to findings of prior studies, 10,59,61,83 numerous white and gray matter structures were involved in these lesions, including the superior sagittal stratum, anterior thalamic radiations, inferior frontal gyrus, Brodmann areas 44 and 45, cingula, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Lesioning of these structures probably explains the known side effects of lobotomy, such as emotional flattening, postoperative seizures, and changes to cognitive function and personality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Lesion size for this data set was found to be much larger than that of modern lesioning techniques; mean (± standard error) volume was 84.6 ± 1.9 ml. Similar to findings of prior studies, 10,59,61,83 numerous white and gray matter structures were involved in these lesions, including the superior sagittal stratum, anterior thalamic radiations, inferior frontal gyrus, Brodmann areas 44 and 45, cingula, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Lesioning of these structures probably explains the known side effects of lobotomy, such as emotional flattening, postoperative seizures, and changes to cognitive function and personality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Subsequently, Naeser et al (1981) and Tsai et al (1983) reported reversals of asymmetry in the occipital but not the frontal lobe, and Luchins et al (1981) replicated their earlier finding of reversal of occipital lobe asymmetry. However, the situation became much less clear as a number of negative reports began to appear (Andreasen et al 1982;Jemigan et al 1982;Nyback et al 1982;Weinberger et al 1982;Luchins and Meltzer 1983).…”
Section: Schizophreniasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Luchins et al (1979) first reported that the pattern of hemispheric asymmetry normally detected by computed tomography (CT) (right hemisphere greater in size than the left; R > L) was reversed in schizophrenics. This result was confirmed by some subsequent CT studies (Naeser et al 1981;Luchins et al 1982;Nyback et al 1983;Tsai et al 1983), but not by all; several groups reported no difference in cranial or hemispheric asymmetry between schizophrenics and controls (Andreasen et al 1982;Jernigan et al 1982;Weinberger et al 1982). Reviewing these findings, Tsai et al (1983) attributed some of the discrepancy to heterogeneous patient and control groups, and to the inconsistency of methods used for quantification of asymmetry.…”
Section: Cerebral Hemispheric Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 79%