Frontal EEG/ERP correlates of attentional processes, cortisol and motivational states in adolescents from lower and higher socioeconomic status

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) and other electroencephalographic (EEG) evidence show that frontal brain areas of higher and lower socioeconomic status (SES) children are recruited differently during selective attention tasks. We assessed whether multiple variables related to self-regulation (perceived mental effort) emotional states (e.g., anxiety, stress, etc.) and motivational states (e.g., boredom, engagement, etc.) may co-occur or interact with frontal attentional processing probed in two matched-samples of fourteen lower-SES and higher-SES adolescents. ERP and EEG activation were measured during a task probing selective attention to sequences of tones. Pre- and post-task salivary cortisol and self-reported emotional states were also measured. At similar behavioural performance level, the higher-SES group showed a greater ERP differentiation between attended (relevant) and unattended (irrelevant) tones than the lower-SES group. EEG power analysis revealed a cross-over interaction, specifically, lower-SES adolescents showed significantly higher theta power when ignoring rather than attending to tones, whereas, higher-SES adolescents showed the opposite pattern. Significant theta asymmetry differences were also found at midfrontal electrodes indicating left hypo-activity in lower-SES adolescents. The attended vs. unattended difference in right midfrontal theta increased with individual SES rank, and (independently from SES) with lower cortisol task reactivity and higher boredom. Results suggest lower-SES children used additional compensatory resources to monitor/control response inhibition to distracters, perceiving also more mental effort, as compared to higher-SES counterparts. Nevertheless, stress, boredom and other task-related perceived states were unrelated to SES. Ruling out presumed confounds, this study confirms the midfrontal mechanisms responsible for the SES effects on selective attention reported previously and here reflect genuine cognitive differences.

Exposure to Violence Predicting Cortisol Response During Adolescence and Early Adulthood: Understanding Moderating Factors

“…In fact, chronic cortisol responses to daily stressors, which may cause damage over the long term, are suggested when cortisol levels remain attenuated (Compas et al 1989). It is also important to note that cortisol is mobilized when individuals are effortfully engaged in a task (D’Angiulli et al 2012; Tops et al 2006); thus, an attenuated response over time may reflect a lack of engagement in the interview, which may be interpreted as a maladaptive, withdrawn behavior. Finally, our rates of responsivity are similar to that reported in previous research (Dockray et al 2009; Schmeelk-Cone et al 2003; Susman 2006), suggesting consistency with other studies.…”

How Socioeconomic Disadvantages Get Under the Skin and into the Brain to Influence Health Development Across the Lifespan

“…In both early childhood (Stevens et al 2009) and adolescence (D'Angiulli et al 2008;D'Angiulli et al 2012), low SES children showed reduced responses to target stimuli and increased responses to distractor stimuli. This pattern of neural activation may contribute to poor suppression of responses to distracting information and less filtering of irrelevant information.…”

Attending, learning, and socioeconomic disadvantage: developmental cognitive and social neuroscience of resilience and vulnerability

“…In an auditory selective attention task, differences were found when assessing midfrontal cortical response to attended and unattended tones in low‐ and high‐SES children. Results showed that high‐SES children filter out distractors and selectively attend to relevant information, while low‐SES children attend to both distractors and relevant information equally, which may be an indication of late filtering . Other studies have reported similar findings with low‐SES children demonstrating a similar allocation of attention across different types of information and tasks .…”

“…Results showed that high-SES children filter out distractors and selectively attend to relevant information, while low-SES children attend to both distractors and relevant information equally, which may be an indication of late filtering. 3,44 Other studies have reported similar findings with low-SES children demonstrating a similar allocation of attention across different types of information and tasks. 45 During these tasks, frontal cortical areas were recruited differently in the SES groups compared.…”