2017
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal EEG asymmetry during symptom provocation predicts subjective responses to intrusions in survivors with and without PTSD

Abstract: Studies suggest that frontal alpha asymmetry is closely linked to psychological adjustment following stressful experiences, such that more left-sided frontal activation during symptom provocation might predict lower levels of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Here, we tested whether frontal asymmetry at rest and during exposure to neutral, positive, negative, and trauma-related images would be associated with PTSD, and particularly with characteristic reexperiencing symptoms. Symptoms were assessed in trau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, type of trauma experience may play a role in heterogeneity of EEG results. Although PTSD+ and PTSD− combat veterans do not differ in frontal or parietal alpha asymmetry (47), other studies indicate that PTSD− who have experienced other types of traumatic events (accidents and witness to injury/death) similar to PTSD+ exhibit greater left frontal alpha asymmetry than PTSD+, a pattern thought to reflect resilience, or protection against deleterious effects of stress (42, 43, 102). Perhaps prolonged exposure to certain types of trauma such as combat alters brain function regardless of the degree of clinical symptoms experienced, although more research is warranted to test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Electroencephalography Frequency Patterns Linked To Trauma Ementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, type of trauma experience may play a role in heterogeneity of EEG results. Although PTSD+ and PTSD− combat veterans do not differ in frontal or parietal alpha asymmetry (47), other studies indicate that PTSD− who have experienced other types of traumatic events (accidents and witness to injury/death) similar to PTSD+ exhibit greater left frontal alpha asymmetry than PTSD+, a pattern thought to reflect resilience, or protection against deleterious effects of stress (42, 43, 102). Perhaps prolonged exposure to certain types of trauma such as combat alters brain function regardless of the degree of clinical symptoms experienced, although more research is warranted to test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Electroencephalography Frequency Patterns Linked To Trauma Ementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Increased trauma severity in boys is associated with increased left frontal asymmetry (40); however, PTSD+ and PTSD− do not differ in males with a history of combat-related trauma (47). Mixed-gender samples also show conflicting findings, with PTSD+/PTSD− trauma-exposed individuals exhibiting greater left frontal asymmetry than PTSD− non-exposed participants (43), PTSD+ showing similar asymmetry patterns as PTSD− without traumatic histories (103), and non-significant relationships between frontal asymmetry and trauma, depression, and anxiety severity (100). Lack of consistent findings could be related to: 1) sex differences in frontal asymmetry previously reported in the literature, with depression linked to left frontal asymmetry in men but right frontal asymmetry in women (154), divergent patterns that may be obscured by not directly comparing males and females in statistical analyses; 2) use of a Cz reference montage (100), shown to be the least consistent in producing reliable asymmetry results (152); and 3) recruitment of “super controls” who differ on various personality/mood variables from PTSD+ individuals (103).…”
Section: Electroencephalography Frequency Patterns Linked To Trauma Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these considerations are several particularly influential issues (Smith et al, 2017): (a) the choice of reference (or CSD transformation), (b) the selection of methods for handling artifacts, (c) using designs with resting state versus experimental challenges, and (d) specifying models explicitly for testing mediating and moderating relationships of frontal asymmetry with individual differences or experimental manipulations. In this issue, several articles include exemplary treatment of these issues including the use of the CSD transformation (Rodrigues, M€ uller, M€ uhlberger, & Hewig, 2018;Smith, Cavanagh, & Allen, 2018) and experimental state manipulations (Meyer et al, 2018;Nelson, Kessel, Klein, & Shankman, 2018;Rodrigues et al, 2018;Schmid, Hackel, Jasperse, & Amodio, 2018;Wacker, 2018).…”
Section: Methodological and Conceptual Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models suggest that the hippocampus plays a primary role mainly in early encoding and retrieval (Bergstrom, ; Frankland & Bontempi, ), with others purporting that the hippocampus is continuously involved in shaping memory retrieval over time (Bergstrom, ; Nadel & Moscovitch, ). Whether hippocampus is critical solely to original encoding, or encoding and maintenance of memories, both the original encoding of traumatic memory and maintenance (expressed as intrusive symptoms) have been postulated as key mechanisms involved in PTSD development (Meyer et al, ). Hence, research on neural correlates of memory processes in the hippocampus is highly relevant to elucidation of PTSD pathophysiology.…”
Section: Memory and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%