2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.hna.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Front-Tracking Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to avoid this issue, a number of techniques have been developed that instead track the motion of the interface explicitly. Front tracking methods, introduced in the works of Glimm et al and She et al and extended to DG in the work of Nguyen et al, are particularly well suited for tracking the evolution of material or contact discontinuities. Rather than requiring physical interfaces to be aligned with grid interfaces, the extended finite element method uses local enrichment functions to represent interfaces that require special quadrature rules to perform the numerical integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to avoid this issue, a number of techniques have been developed that instead track the motion of the interface explicitly. Front tracking methods, introduced in the works of Glimm et al and She et al and extended to DG in the work of Nguyen et al, are particularly well suited for tracking the evolution of material or contact discontinuities. Rather than requiring physical interfaces to be aligned with grid interfaces, the extended finite element method uses local enrichment functions to represent interfaces that require special quadrature rules to perform the numerical integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned in the introduction, we refer to this new method as to extrapolated Shock-Tracking (eST) to differentiate it from unstructured shock fitting, in which a conformal mesh fitting the shock front is generated, and to differentiate it from the SBM, in which the true boundary is replaced by a unique surrogate with extrapolated boundary values. The eST method actually has similarities with high-order front tracking approaches [28], and also for this reason we prefer referring to it as shock-tracking. It may also be viewed as some sort of elaborate solution optimization procedure in which, starting from a captured result, one iteratively places the shock front and modifies the flow solution by solving the nonlinear jump conditions.…”
Section: Extrapolated Shock-trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the extension of the SBM to hyperbolic problems [27], the approach proposed here requires the solution of three coupled problems: the CFD upstream of the shock, the CFD downstream of the shock, the coupled algebraic system obtained from the Rankine-Hugoniot relations augmented with the characteristic information traveling toward the shock front. As in shock-fitting and front tracking methods [28], the shock front is explicitly discretized by an independent lower-dimensional mesh, and its position, as well as the position of the two surrogate boundaries, are themselves part of the computational result. These elements make the present work not only original w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this approach is eliminating the possibility of discontinuities in the thermal state, concentration, or thermodynamic phase that can result from the application of Eulerian advection methods. 10 However, two main challenges to the development and use of chemical kinetic models are present. The first challenge is the fact that various reactor models are needed for the modeling and simulation of different combustion problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%