2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Front-label health claims: when less is more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
84
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, people's preferences for different claim architecture and whether they prefer a positive or negative frame depend on the type of benefit proposed. This may explain some of the contradictory results of earlier research (13,26,27) . Personal relevance and people's perceived need for information affect perceptions of health claims with different architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In addition, people's preferences for different claim architecture and whether they prefer a positive or negative frame depend on the type of benefit proposed. This may explain some of the contradictory results of earlier research (13,26,27) . Personal relevance and people's perceived need for information affect perceptions of health claims with different architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The PLANNER and INVOLV variables are thought to capture this effect. The role of claims has also been explored with respect to label use (e.g., [30][31][32], and therefore the variable HCLAIMTR is introduced to test if the perceived believability of health and nutrition claims influences label use. Drichoutis et al [3] showed the effect of several attitudinal and behavioural factors on label use, and therefore we introduce some lifestyle factors to explain label use (i.e., OBESE, OVWEIGHT, NOSMOKE, SMSTOP).…”
Section: Measurement Of Variables and Econometric Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wansink et al and Feunekes et al discovered that, compared with longer descriptions, shorter descriptions on a product packaging lead to a more positive impression and image [35,36]. Feunekes found that too much information (information overload) might cause confusion for consumers at the actual consumption point.…”
Section: The Amount and Form Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%