2021
DOI: 10.5185/amlett.2021.091659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Zero to Infinity: Customized Atomistic Calculations for Crystalline Solids —Applications to Graphene and Diamond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…184 The energy E g characterizes the metallic ( e.g. , electroconductivity) and optoelectronic 16,24,132,187–189 properties of clusters as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…184 The energy E g characterizes the metallic ( e.g. , electroconductivity) and optoelectronic 16,24,132,187–189 properties of clusters as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of a substantial departure from sphericity and with a change in the packing pattern with n increase, the dependence of the characteristic in question on the number of atoms may be more complex. 1,3,132 For instance, the expression for F S in eqn (8) can be generalized to the form F S ( n ) = 4( x surf n −1/3 + x edge n −2/3 + x corn n −1 )to include, besides the surface term involving x surf coefficient, contributions from atoms with other coordinative environments than the cluster surface, namely, edge and corner atoms with corresponding x edge and x corn factors (see ref. 9 and 19 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To remedy this Zdetsis A. D. , Bandgaps of Atomically precise AGNRs and Occam's Razor problem we have recently suggested 25 to fit the calculated ΔΕac as a function of L efficiently and transparently 1,25 to a polynomial of the form ΔΕac(L)=A+B×L -C , where the value A corresponds to the gap at infinity, ΔΕac(∞)=A, and the constant C to some short of effective ("fractal") dimensionality (here equal to 1.20). 1,25 As we can see in the inset in Fig. 2(b), the projected ΔΕac value is 1.07 eV, which is also verified by the TDDFT result ΔΕac =1.01 eV (see Fig.…”
Section: (A) the Edge Modified Agnrs By Construction Have No Edge Sta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3] Comparing the behavior of the "bulk gap" in Figs. problem we have recently suggested 24 to fit the calculated ΔΕac as a function of L efficiently and transparently 1,24 to a polynomial of the form ΔΕac(L)=A+B×L -C , where the value A corresponds to the gap at infinity, ΔΕac(∞)=A, and the constant C to some short of effective ("fractal") dimensionality (here equal to 1.20). 1,24 As we can see in the inset in Fig.…”
Section: (A) the Edge Modified Agnrs By Construction Have No Edge States And Their Homos Andmentioning
confidence: 99%