2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32239-7_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Whole Slide Imaging to Microscopy: Deep Microscopy Adaptation Network for Histopathology Cancer Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach is based on unsupervised domain adaption, which aims to transfer knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain [22]. The authors evaluate their method by benchmarking it on a medical image diagnosis dataset consisting of H&E stained colon histopathology slides [23] with a convincing performance.…”
Section: Noisy Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is based on unsupervised domain adaption, which aims to transfer knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain [22]. The authors evaluate their method by benchmarking it on a medical image diagnosis dataset consisting of H&E stained colon histopathology slides [23] with a convincing performance.…”
Section: Noisy Labelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For medical imaging, feature-based adversarial domain adaptation has been widely utilized for various applications. For example, in cross-modality adaptation, Zhang et al, [75] applied a domain discriminator to adapt models trained for pathology images to microscopy images. LSFT-DA is also used for single-modality adaptation to overcome dataset variations in pathology images, MR images, and ultrasound images.…”
Section: Adversarial Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they focus on globally aligning domain distributions. However, the ability to transfer (or align) varies across clinical samples because of: (a) intra-domain variations (e.g., in multi-modal DA between MRI and CT, each modality can have contrast variations) [75]; (b) noisy annotations due to human subjectivity; (c) target label space being a subset of source label space [84]; and (d) varying transferability among different image regions [55] (e.g., tumors are difficult to translate and could be missed during CT to MRI image-translation [54]). Some samples in the source domain may be less useful and can lead to negative transferring [84], which adversely impacts DA.…”
Section: Transferability Of Individual Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work of Kamnitsas et al ( 2017 ) utilises an adversarial training approach for unsupervised domain adaptation from Gradient Echo images to Susceptibility Weighted Images for brain lesion segmentation task. Moreover, an adversarial domain adaptation from Whole Slide pathology to Microscopy images has been studied in Zhang et al ( 2019 ). Chen et al ( 2020 ) proposed simultaneous image to image translation and domain alignment between CT and MRI images using a modification of a CycleGAN for cardiac and abdominal multi-organ segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%