81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 2019
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201901293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Well Logs to Stratigraphic Layering: Automation, Uncertainties and Impact on Reservoir Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional data or concepts could also be integrated in the method, preferably as cost function to be combined to the proposed correlation cost function, as an ancillary geological likelihood data to evaluate the results (e.g., de la Varga and Wellmann, 2016). Posterior analysis on the generated stratigraphic model may be achieved to evaluate the physical likelihood of the correlation outcomes (layer connectivities) like hydraulic or tracer simulation tests (e.g., Baville et al, 2019). Another way to scrutinize and improve the results could be to analyze the geometry of the chronostratigraphic units and their consistency with dipmeter data and subsidence analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional data or concepts could also be integrated in the method, preferably as cost function to be combined to the proposed correlation cost function, as an ancillary geological likelihood data to evaluate the results (e.g., de la Varga and Wellmann, 2016). Posterior analysis on the generated stratigraphic model may be achieved to evaluate the physical likelihood of the correlation outcomes (layer connectivities) like hydraulic or tracer simulation tests (e.g., Baville et al, 2019). Another way to scrutinize and improve the results could be to analyze the geometry of the chronostratigraphic units and their consistency with dipmeter data and subsidence analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%