2016
DOI: 10.3390/su8070622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Waste Management to Resource Efficiency—The Need for Policy Mixes

Abstract: Abstract:Treating waste as a resource and the design of a circular economy have been identified as key approaches for resource efficiency. Despite ambitious targets, policies and instruments that would enable a transition from a conventional waste management to an integrated and comprehensive resource management are still missing. Moreover, this will require innovative policy mixes which do not only address different end-of-pipe approaches but integrate various resource efficiency aspects from product design t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of a concrete, coherent, and strict legislative framework often impedes SMEs' consideration of integrating green solutions in their operations. For example, in EU waste legislation there is no coherent definition or classification of waste materials (e.g., to distinguish waste from byproduct materials used for recycling), thus inducing limitations on cross-border transportation of waste [36], while there are significant differences in the ambition of targets along the waste hierarchy [37]. This is reinforced by the lack of appropriate market signals (low prices of raw materials), which does not encourage the efficient use of resources or the transition to a circular economy [38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of a concrete, coherent, and strict legislative framework often impedes SMEs' consideration of integrating green solutions in their operations. For example, in EU waste legislation there is no coherent definition or classification of waste materials (e.g., to distinguish waste from byproduct materials used for recycling), thus inducing limitations on cross-border transportation of waste [36], while there are significant differences in the ambition of targets along the waste hierarchy [37]. This is reinforced by the lack of appropriate market signals (low prices of raw materials), which does not encourage the efficient use of resources or the transition to a circular economy [38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such as lifecycle thinking, consideration of systemic levels and interplay between implementation levels (macro, meso, micro, and nano) are essential for an effective measure of product performance in the light of circular economy. Additionally, a multi-dimensional scoring system representing different perspectives of circular economy should be preferred, and ideally, distinction between circularity loops-in direct link with Lansink's ladder of waste hierarchy [43,44]-should be established [45]. As there are different ways to close the loop, the overall circularity score should go further than a single and global score that encompasses and consider all different possible closed-loops at the same level without differentiation.…”
Section: Practical Implications and Guidance For The Design Of Such Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycling 2017, 2, 6 13 of 18 should be established [45]. As there are different ways to close the loop, the overall circularity score should go further than a single and global score that encompasses and consider all different possible closed-loops at the same level without differentiation.…”
Section: Circularity Class C: Refurbish/remanufacturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional techniques for management of biodegradable wastes are becoming increasingly expensive and energy inefficient. Secondly, the chemical treatment methods are hazardous to both environment and humans (Wilts et al, 2016). As a result, search for more sustainable approaches becomes important for conversion of wastes into byproducts that can be directly used for commercial purposes (Benhabiles et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%