Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-912-2_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Victimhood to Political Protagonism: Victim Groups and Associations in the Process of Dealing with a Violent Past

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet it is the international understanding of victims' roles that has changed most dramatically in the past century. It was especially the new regime of human rights in the late 1970s and later humanitarian intervention of the 1990s that placed victims as important beneficiaries of international criminal justice measures, which were aimed at reconciliation and thus peace (Bonacker and Buckley-Zistel 2013;Strassner 2013). However, victims were initially treated as secondary to legal and forensics processes and integrated only as auxiliary providers of information regarding the circumstances of their victimization, i.e., the original act of harm, in order to make a legal case to prosecute perpetrators.…”
Section: Witnesses Of Crimes and Universal Moral Beaconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet it is the international understanding of victims' roles that has changed most dramatically in the past century. It was especially the new regime of human rights in the late 1970s and later humanitarian intervention of the 1990s that placed victims as important beneficiaries of international criminal justice measures, which were aimed at reconciliation and thus peace (Bonacker and Buckley-Zistel 2013;Strassner 2013). However, victims were initially treated as secondary to legal and forensics processes and integrated only as auxiliary providers of information regarding the circumstances of their victimization, i.e., the original act of harm, in order to make a legal case to prosecute perpetrators.…”
Section: Witnesses Of Crimes and Universal Moral Beaconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Victims are at best consultees and witnesses, not decision makers, 2 and therefore their ownership over these processes remains limited. The actual and potential participation of victims and their organisations in TJ procedures remains little explored (Strassner 2013;de Waardt 2016).…”
Section: Victim-centred Transitional Justice: Participation Ownership and Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of its progressive framework for promoting victim participation, and the efforts taken by public servants and victim leaders to ensure the widest 'effective participation' of victims, this examination shows it has been complicated to explore the possibilities of victim organisations' socio-political engagement to foster localised approaches to TJ. 7 Some scholars have noted that few studies deal with grassroots activists, such as organised victims of human rights violations (McEvoy and McGregor 2008), while the political participation of victim organisations in TJ procedures and their potential intermediary role is also little explored (Strassner 2013;de Waardt 2016). Gready and Robins (2017) argue that especially victim organisations 'represent a mobilisation of those affected by violations, able to act locally and use a range of repertoires of action, but also engage with a formal TJ process and NGOs' (Gready and Robins 2017: 964).…”
Section: The Challenges Facing Victims' Political Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%