2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.indag.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From van der Corput to modern constructions of sequences for quasi-Monte Carlo rules

Abstract: In 1935 J.G. van der Corput introduced a sequence which has excellent uniform distribution properties modulo 1. This sequence is based on a very simple digital construction scheme with respect to the binary digit expansion. Nowadays the van der Corput sequence, as it was named later, is the prototype of many uniformly distributed sequences, also in the multi-dimensional case. Such sequences are required as sample nodes in quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms, which are deterministic variants of Monte Carlo rules for n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(296 reference statements)
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. = |z K | = A, we not only get a much larger range of validity for our upper bound (54) on κ(V N ×K ) than for the general upper bound (52), but we also obtain sharper bounds on σ 2 min (V N ×K ) and σ 2 max (V N ×K ) as the corresponding results are based on (36), which, as pointed out in [53], is best possible. One would hope that the constant 42/π in (35) could be improved to be closer to the corresponding constant 1/2 in (25) or that 42/π could be turned into a smaller constant which would possibly depend on min 1 k K |z k | and/or max 1 k K |z k | as in the Graham-Vaaler result (36).…”
Section: Extremal Singular Values Of Vandermonde Matrices With Nodes supporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…. = |z K | = A, we not only get a much larger range of validity for our upper bound (54) on κ(V N ×K ) than for the general upper bound (52), but we also obtain sharper bounds on σ 2 min (V N ×K ) and σ 2 max (V N ×K ) as the corresponding results are based on (36), which, as pointed out in [53], is best possible. One would hope that the constant 42/π in (35) could be improved to be closer to the corresponding constant 1/2 in (25) or that 42/π could be turned into a smaller constant which would possibly depend on min 1 k K |z k | and/or max 1 k K |z k | as in the Graham-Vaaler result (36).…”
Section: Extremal Singular Values Of Vandermonde Matrices With Nodes supporting
confidence: 54%
“…A(x, y, z) = 1/(z(e 2x/z − 1)) B(x, y, z) = e 2x/z /(z(e 2x/z − 1)), for x > 0, y > 0, and z > 0, to (36) then yields (42).…”
Section: Appendix B Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A large number of other variants of van der Corput and Halton sequences has been studied in the literature and for many of them strong discrepancy bounds can be derived (see e.g. [12,18,19,21,26,27,38]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%