The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2021
DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2103614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Vaccine Nationalism to Vaccine Equity — Finding a Path Forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
129
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a global perspective, this research also raises questions about health protection for the broader global community as advocated by the World Health Organization [18]. When many of the world's population is still unvaccinated, ethical questions about whether it is fair to vaccinate younger people in more wealthy nations while the elderly and most vulnerable in less wealthy nations are still at a higher risk of fatal outcomes [4,19]. With many people in wealthy nations looking to travel, some researchers have stated that vaccine equity should be the priority over vaccine passports [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a global perspective, this research also raises questions about health protection for the broader global community as advocated by the World Health Organization [18]. When many of the world's population is still unvaccinated, ethical questions about whether it is fair to vaccinate younger people in more wealthy nations while the elderly and most vulnerable in less wealthy nations are still at a higher risk of fatal outcomes [4,19]. With many people in wealthy nations looking to travel, some researchers have stated that vaccine equity should be the priority over vaccine passports [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the availability of many COVID-19 vaccines, there is hope that the pandemic will be brought to an end [2]. Given the limited vaccines, there has been general scientific consensus that people in the over 65 age category, as well as those with underlying medical conditions, should be provided high priority [3][4]. At this time, however, there is a high degree of inequity regarding vaccine distribution, and many countries with vulnerable elderly populations have not yet received a vaccine [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, of 832 million vaccine doses administered, 82% was distributed to high-or upper-middle-income countries, whereas low-income countries only received 0.2% of the total [150]. The unequal distribution might result in vast disparities in health and economic well-being [151]. There are several reasons behind the unequal distribution.…”
Section: Critical Lessons For Further Improvements and Efficiency Of Vaccination Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons behind the unequal distribution. The high cost and technical requirements of delivering vaccines and transferring vaccine technology are some of them [149,151,152]. For reducing such costs, besides continuing to innovate vaccines to be more affordable and easier to stockpile (e.g., one-dose vaccines), vaccines have to be allocated more efficiently with the right amount of supply for the real demand.…”
Section: Critical Lessons For Further Improvements and Efficiency Of Vaccination Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data available in the public domain are insufficiently harmonized, making the direct comparisons biased, especially across countries and different timelines. On the other hand, our global response to the pandemic remains patchy and consequently less effective than it should be ( 16 ), especially in the domain of vaccine delivery and distribution ( 17 ). This lack of evidence-based, equitable, and global response to the pandemic puts all of us at an increased risk of new variants being generated and will surely extend the need for anti-epidemic measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%