From Utopia to Dystopia: Levels of explanation and the politics of social psychology

Abstract

This paper considers the political underpinnings of the debate surrounding levels of explanation in social psychology. The development of this discipline since the late 1920s has been informed by an individualistic view of human nature inspired by political liberalism. The article first considers how social psychological research on attribution and forced compliance has questioned the validity of this view. With the latest development in social cognition and social neuroscience, this liberal view has been replaced by another variant of individualism which leaves little room to individual freedom. George Herbert Mead's view of the self and mind as outcomes of social organisation is presented as an alternative to these two forms of individualism. In conclusion, I suggest that, informed by a Meadian perspective, social psychology should address the challenge posed by the advent of neurosciences by considering how social factors may impact upon brain functioning."Every man, for his individual good and for the good of his society, is responsible for his own development. The choices that govern his life are choices that he must make; they cannot be made by any other human being" (Goldwater, cited by Brooks, 2008).

Reading the Public: Political Action and Its Relationship to Constructions of Political Disagreement and Opinion Climate in the Context of Brexit

“…Salient here is a narrative which construes the collective as irrational and emotional, as a threat to the autonomy, freedom, and rationality of the individual (Greenwood, ). These values are foundational for political liberalism, a belief system which, arguably, has buttressed the social psychology's historic individualistic focus (Farr, ; Klein, ). This interpretation sheds light on the potential contribution of an SRA to the understanding of dynamic democratic processes via (1) making salient the ideological baggage which meta‐representations carry and (2) calling our attention to their historical and contextual contingency.…”

A century of victimhood: Antecedents and current impacts of perceived suffering in World War I across Europe

“…In raising such a possibility, however, one should be cautious about levels of explanation (cf. Klein, ). Thus, victimized groups may develop a stronger national identity across generations.…”

Untitled

“…О. Клен определяет глубинные основы и факторы научного объяснения в социальной психологии (Klein, 2009). По его мнению, теории в социальной психологии на протяжении XX в. во многом зависели от политических установок.…”