From the sea to aquafeed: A perspective overview

Eroldoğan, Orhan Tufan; Glencross, Brett; Novoveská, Lucie; Gaudêncio, Susana P.; Rinkevich, B.; Varese, Giovanna Cristina; Carvalho, Maria de Fátima; Taşdemir, Deniz; Šafařı́k, Ivo; Nielsen, Søren Laurentius; Rebours, Céline; Lada, Lukić Bilela; Robbens, Johan; Strode, Evita; Haznedaroğlu, Berat Z.; Kotta, Jonne; Evliyaoğlu, Ece; Oliveira, Juliana; Girão, Mariana; Vasquez, Marlen I.; Čabarkapa, Ivana; Rakita, Slađana; Klun, Katja; Rotter, Ana

doi:10.1111/raq.12740

Cited by 30 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 382 publications

(600 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the major issues faced by aquaculture industry is the resource shortage of fish meal (FM). As the largest production plant protein in the world, soy protein has long been used to replace FM in aquafeeds 66 . Replacement of FM with soy products at high levels often compromises fillet firmness, which has been reported in Jian carp ( Cyprinus carpio var.…”

Section: Strategies To Regulate Texture Characteristics In Aquaculturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, growing lines of studies have investigated the potential use of novel protein sources from animals, plants, and microorganisms that could help reduce the dependence of FM and soya products in feedstuffs and contribute to the sustainable development of aquaculture 66 . Texture quality has been employed as an important evaluation indicator in these studies.…”

Section: Strategies To Regulate Texture Characteristics In Aquaculturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The flesh texture of teleost fish: Characteristics and interventional strategies

Wang,

Qiao,

Zhang

et al. 2023

Reviews in Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the growing demand of consumers for high‐quality aquatic products, controlling the harvest quality of farmed fish is becoming increasingly important in aquaculture industry. The texture is a sensory property that covers a group of attributes, such as firmness, tenderness, chewiness, adhesiveness, resilience, etc., which greatly determine consumers' perception and satisfaction for flesh products. Regarding texture quality, extensive research has been conducted in recent decades based on its related theories, influencing factors, and intervention strategies. However, the information available is largely scattered and disjointed. Essentially, flesh texture is mainly determined by the collective contribution of three major muscle components: muscle fibres, intramuscular connective tissue, and intramuscular fat. Therefore, changing these components in living animals through nutritional and management factors has the potential to modulate texture quality. Here, we briefly introduced the features and development of the three muscle components mentioned above, particularly their potential contributions to texture quality of fish flesh. Exciting promises to manipulate flesh texture through dietary intervention, feed restriction, and exercise training were also discussed. To ensure their applications in large‐scale aquaculture facilities, specific considerations of these regimens should be incorporated in experimental design parameters, including the species and age of fish, research system, experiment duration, and exercise intensity. Finally, the existing challenges and limitations of fish texture studies were presented, along with some viewpoints about current work and future directions of this field.

show abstract

Section: Strategies To Regulate Texture Characteristics In Aquaculturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Strategies To Regulate Texture Characteristics In Aquaculturementioning

confidence: 99%

The flesh texture of teleost fish: Characteristics and interventional strategies

Wang,

Qiao,

Zhang

et al. 2023

Reviews in Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The width represents the approximate relative percentage of an ingredient type in the feed. For future aquafeed (aquafeed 3.0), the width is based on refs 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 39 but remain largely speculative. According to these refs and circularity principles, aquafeed 3.0 would contain mainly non‐food‐competing feedstuff from the circular economy (section 4.2).…”

Section: First Principle: Safeguarding and Regenerating The Health Of...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although some CE concepts have been explored for aquaculture, these studies have focused on relatively few topics. The most studied CE concepts for modern aquaculture include waste management, 14 recycling of nutrients and byproducts, [15][16][17][18] novel ingredients in aquafeeds derived from the CE, 19,20 and production systems that reuse excess nutrients at the farm scale (e.g., aquaponics, integrated multitrophic aquaculture [IMTA]) or at a large scale in combination with agriculture (e.g., reusing sludge from ponds/tanks as fertiliser). 21 These applications do not encompass all aspects of Muscat et al's framework.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transforming sustainable aquaculture by applying circularity principles

Chary,

van Riel,

Muscat

et al. 2023

Reviews in Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A circular economy is considered one way to reduce environmental impacts of human activities, by more efficient use of resources and recovery, resulting in less waste and emissions compared to linear take‐make‐dispose systems. Muscat et al. developed five ecological principles to guide biomass use towards a circular economy. A few studies have demonstrated environmental benefits of applying these principles to land‐based food systems, but to date, these principles have not been explored in aquaculture. The current study expands on these principles and provides a narrative review to (i) translate them to aquaculture, while identifying implications for the main species and production systems, and (ii) identify the main pathways to make aquaculture more circular. We show that the underlying concepts of the ‘safeguard’, ‘entropy’, and ‘recycle’ principles have been well researched and sometimes well implemented. In contrast, the ‘avoid’ and ‘prioritise’ principles have been explored much less; doing so would provide an opportunity to decrease environmental impacts of aquaculture at the food‐system level. One example is prioritising the production of species that contribute to food and nutrition security, have low environmental impacts and thinking at wider food system scale to avoid feed‐food competition in aquaculture. We identified six priorities that could make aquaculture more circular: (i) increase production and demand for the most essential species, (ii) decrease food loss and waste at farm and post‐harvest stages, (iii) support nutrient recycling practices at multiple scales, (iv) adapt aquafeed formulations, (v) inform consumers about benefits of species of low trophic levels and other environmentally friendly aquatic foods, and (vi) address urgent research gaps.

show abstract

“…The review by Yun et al 23 presented how seaweed‐farming waste streams could be industrially lucrative. An interesting review 24 contributed to the process of ‘reduce’ by reviewing marine resources that would reduce the land‐use dependency of aquaculture.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%