2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18269.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the molecular-cloud- to the embedded-cluster-mass function with a density threshold for star formation

Abstract: The mass function of molecular clouds and clumps is shallower than the mass function of young star clusters, gas‐embedded and gas‐free alike, as their respective mass function indices are β0≃ 1.7 and β★≃ 2. We demonstrate that such a difference can arise from different mass–radius relations for the embedded clusters and the molecular clouds (clumps) hosting them. In particular, the formation of star clusters with a constant mean volume density in the central regions of molecular clouds of constant mean surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
22
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher mass gas clumps may exhibit on average a lower SFE that would steepen the slope from the clump mass function to the IMF. Similar results were recently inferred by Parmentier (2011). In a similar direction, it is worth noting that Simon et al (2001) also inferred for their most luminous mini-starburst W49 the flattest clump mass function with a power-law index of 1.56, in very close agreement with our result for the high-luminosity region W31.…”
Section: The Shape Of the Clump Mass Functionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Higher mass gas clumps may exhibit on average a lower SFE that would steepen the slope from the clump mass function to the IMF. Similar results were recently inferred by Parmentier (2011). In a similar direction, it is worth noting that Simon et al (2001) also inferred for their most luminous mini-starburst W49 the flattest clump mass function with a power-law index of 1.56, in very close agreement with our result for the high-luminosity region W31.…”
Section: The Shape Of the Clump Mass Functionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…this happens when cores/clumps are detected at threshold densities of ≳ 10 5 cm −3 ; Dib & Kim 2007; Dib et al 2007a). The argument of the existence of a threshold density of ∼ 10 5 cm −3 for star formation as proposed by Dib et al (2007a) was also used by Parmentier (2011) who showed that this may well explain the difference between the slope of the mass function of low‐density clouds/clumps (∼−1.7) and that of the high‐density protocluster‐forming clumps (∼−2).…”
Section: Implications For the Embedded Cluster Mass Functionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies have established that star clusters form in dense (≳10 3 cm −3 ) clumps embedded in a lower density parental molecular cloud (e.g. Lada & Lada 2003; Lada, Lombardi & Alves 2010; Csengeri et al 2011; Parmentier 2011). Saito et al (2007) recently studied, using the C 18 O molecular emission line, a large sample of cluster‐forming clumps whose masses and radii vary between [15–1500] M ⊙ and [0.14–0.61] pc, respectively.…”
Section: The Clump and Core Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dense gas mass fraction has been measured for various definitions of dense (Battisti & Heyer 2014;Wu et al 2005), but these definitions don't always correspond to the associated threshold (Kauffmann & Pillai 2010;Parmentier et al 2011;Parmentier 2011). Often, the dense gas threshold is observationally defined as the threshold to see a given molecule, which is sometimes incorrectly assumed to correspond to a fixed critical density for the molecule.…”
Section: /Dvn/26818mentioning
confidence: 99%