2012
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.39105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the Machine Paradigm to Brain Plasticity and How Culture Overrules Biology in Humans

Abstract: This paper emphasises how higher psychological functions develop dialectically from a biological basis and how the brain changes with mental and physical activity in a specific culture due to its plasticity. A scientific psychology cannot ignore that human consciousness exists. Humans' higher psychological functions, their language and thinking, have to be the core of human psychology. The psychological functions cannot be dissolved into biological, neurological processes. The number of human activities under … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though not without its critics (Martínez Mateo, Cabanis, Loebell, & Krach, 2012), cultural neuroscience is enjoying a fertile nascency. Drawing heavily on cultural historical theory, much has been advanced theoretically to guide this empirical explosion under the rubric of biocultural coconstructivism (Kolstad, 2012;Li, 2003Li, , 2006Li, , 2007Li, , 2008. The next generation of culturally and linguistically competent young neuropsychologists, therefore, would do well to familiarize themselves with these developments in the interdisciplinary arena because cultural neuropsychology is uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between the neurosciences and clinical practice.…”
Section: Innovations Trends and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though not without its critics (Martínez Mateo, Cabanis, Loebell, & Krach, 2012), cultural neuroscience is enjoying a fertile nascency. Drawing heavily on cultural historical theory, much has been advanced theoretically to guide this empirical explosion under the rubric of biocultural coconstructivism (Kolstad, 2012;Li, 2003Li, , 2006Li, , 2007Li, , 2008. The next generation of culturally and linguistically competent young neuropsychologists, therefore, would do well to familiarize themselves with these developments in the interdisciplinary arena because cultural neuropsychology is uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between the neurosciences and clinical practice.…”
Section: Innovations Trends and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change will also show up in the neural network of the brain and thus stick to both the mind and the biology. 8 Such change of consciousness and the brain will not have any adverse effects as other interventions in the brain, such as shock therapies, lobotomy and chemotherapy.…”
Section: A Psychosocial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Old functions or elements are still part of a human being, but they have changed to another form, with another meaning and signification during the ontogenetic development. New concepts and activity develop mind and consciousness and this psychological activity also changes the brain by establishing new connections between neurons [11]. The brain adapts to the elaboration of the mind and changes its structure and function to represent the altering and developing mind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant problem for an understanding of human psychology is to clarify the mind/brain relationship. Due to the complexity of the phenomenon and the possibility of choosing different perspectives makes it understandable that there are disagreement and multiple explanations of the same phenomenon [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation