From the Guest Editor

Hagen, Peter L.

doi:10.12930/0271-9517-25.2.3

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To that thought we would add our own firm belief in the fundamental impor tance of linking theory to advising practice and research. (p. 2) Hagen (2005), in his ''From the Guest Editor'' piece, also bolstered the sentiment regarding the importance of appreciating various perspectives:…”

Section: Nacada Journalmentioning

confidence: 98%

From the Co-Editors

Robbins¹,

Shaffer²,

Burton³

2016

NACADA Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the addition of history to the title of the Theory, Philosophy, and History of Advising Commission of NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising, the time has come to reflect on this growing commission as a means to track and record the growth and development of the theoretical debates and questions regarding the field of academic advising. Therefore, I present the rise of the Theory, Philosophy, and History Commission through the lens of two founding members: Marc Lowenstein and Peter Hagen. I also provide insight into the trajectory of dialogue reflected in conference presentations, publications, and primary source documents from NACADA and others.

show abstract

Section: Nacada Journalmentioning

confidence: 98%

From the Co-Editors

Robbins¹,

Shaffer²,

Burton³

2016

NACADA Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This vision extended acceptable ''ways of knowing'' beyond classic social science research methodologies. Articles accepted by Danis provided a template for 21 st Century Journal authors (Champlin-Scharff, 2010;Hagen, 2005;Hagen, 2008). One such article, the most accessed NACADA Journal article from the 1980s (NACADA Journal Google Analytics, August 13, 2021), was David Brookman's (1989) ''Maslow's Hierarchy and Student Retention.''…”

Section: -1989: Edward J Danismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…No one field has even come close to cornering the market. (E. White, personal communication, March 31, 2021) More than three decades after Boyer (1990), the ''quantitative vs. qualitative'' debate continues among social science researchers while authors schooled in the humanities suggest additional ways of knowing (Hagen, 2005).…”

Section: -1989: Edward J Danismentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Journal Articles and Editors That Shaped the Evolution of Scholarly Writing in Academic Advising, 1972-2001

Miller

2022

NACADA Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides a historical perspective on the development of scholarly writing in academic advising beginning in 1972 with some of the first journal articles solely devoted to advising and continuing through the initial 20 years of the NACADA Journal—the premier advising publication venue during the period. An important part of the evolution of advising's scholarly writing was the vision and perspective of each NACADA Journal editor. Each brought a distinct set of academic experiences to the job, each defined scholarship, and especially research, differently. Early (1972–2001) scholarly articles and the editors who published them shaped academic advising's literature base. This article analyzes the contributions made by these early articles and editors.

show abstract

“…The call for research and theory building has been given many voices in publications, but a few collaborative efforts stand out as milestones along the road to the professionalization of advising. A 2005 NACADA Journal issue was dedicated entirely to scholarship and ''theory building in academic advising'' (Hagen, 2005, p. 3). It offered a range of examples of what guest editor Hagen introduced as two types of theories:…”

Section: Three Pivotal Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Academic Advising: A Discipline of Praxis

Wijngaard

2019

NACADA Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Why do advisors do what they do in their advising practice? What challenges do they face in getting from thought to action, from theory to practice? How do they navigate those challenges? What is their process? What is their method? After briefly surveying the landscape of recent literature on the scholarship of advising, this article explores the concept of praxis in general, underscoring the critical importance of a scholarly approach and activity in academic advising praxis. The article mines the topics of the nature of scholarship in general and the ways in which it relates to praxis, offering concrete examples from within the academic advising profession.

show abstract

From the Guest Editor

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

From the Co-Editors

From the Co-Editors

Early Journal Articles and Editors That Shaped the Evolution of Scholarly Writing in Academic Advising, 1972-2001

Academic Advising: A Discipline of Praxis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About