2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16031-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the Framisation of the Temperley–Lieb Algebra to the Jones Polynomial: An Algebraic Approach

Abstract: We prove that the Framisation of the Temperley-Lieb algebra is isomorphic to a direct sum of matrix algebras over tensor products of classical Temperley-Lieb algebras. We use this result to obtain a closed combinatorial formula for the invariants for classical links obtained from a Markov trace on the Framisation of the Temperley-Lieb algebra. For a given link L, this formula involves the Jones polynomials of all sublinks of L, as well as linking numbers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the rest of the paper, we will only be interested in this case, that is, when E is the inverse of a positive integer d. For d = 1, the invariants Θ and θ coincide with the HOMFLYPT and the Jones polynomial respectively. In general, by [6,Theorem 8.2] and [8, Theorem 5] (see also [5,Example 4.16]), we have: Theorem 3. The invariants Θ and θ are stronger than the HOMFLYPT and the Jones polynomial respectively.…”
Section: A Categorification Of the θ-Invariantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the rest of the paper, we will only be interested in this case, that is, when E is the inverse of a positive integer d. For d = 1, the invariants Θ and θ coincide with the HOMFLYPT and the Jones polynomial respectively. In general, by [6,Theorem 8.2] and [8, Theorem 5] (see also [5,Example 4.16]), we have: Theorem 3. The invariants Θ and θ are stronger than the HOMFLYPT and the Jones polynomial respectively.…”
Section: A Categorification Of the θ-Invariantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as we also explain in Section 3.2, the computation of θ can be seen as a dynamical system whose initial condition is the value of θ on a union of unlinked knots: if L is union of r unlinked knots, we have θ(L) = d r−1 J(L). The invariant θ is stronger than the Jones polynomial, in the sense that it distinguishes links that the Jones polynomial cannot distinguish [6,8,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invariant θ is stronger than the Jones polynomial, in the sense that it distinguishes links that the Jones polynomial cannot distinguish [5,6,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%