From the familiar to the extraordinary: local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK

Abstract

Nearly two decades since the last nuclear power station was built and began operating in the UK, nuclear energy is firmly back on the political agenda domestically and elsewhere in the world. Yet since the 1980s, little research has investigated perceptions of nuclear power in the UK, particularly those of communities living in very close proximity to such facilities. Using biographical narrative interviews (n = 61), we explore how local residents living close to two nuclear power stations in the UK (Bradwell, Essex and Oldbury, South Gloucestershire) have come to view their local facility. We reveal how the power station is constructed through processes of familiarisation and ⁄ or the normalisation ⁄ normification of risk as part of everyday life; how this ordinariness is juxtaposed with moments of extraordinariness in which, due to direct and mediated events, the power station is reframed as a risk issue; and how risk awareness is associated with moments of anxiety which ebb and flow through our interviewees' lives. We conclude that biographical experiences dynamically unfolding through space and time can be interrupted by risk events (mediated and direct, real and symbolic, nuclear and non-nuclear) to disrupt the usually taken-for-granted ordinariness of a power station's presence in a particular locality. Our findings suggest that those involved in debate about new nuclear build must be sensitive to the heterogeneity of the extraordinary in nuclear affairs and the importance of socio-cultural histories of place. key words everyday risk perceptions nuclear power local communities narrative method risk biography

Awareness, concern and willingness to adopt biosecure behaviours: public perceptions of invasive tree pests and pathogens in the UK

“…As Irwin (2001) points out: ''Environmental problems do not sit apart from everyday life (as if they were discrete from other issues and concerns) but instead are accommodated within (and help shape) the social construction of local reality'' (p. 175). There is considerable scope for applying place-based approaches for understanding the particular socio-cultural and spatial contexts within which risk perceptions are constructed (Henwood et al 2008;Parkhill et al 2010).…”

Distance matters. Assessing socioeconomic impacts of the Dukovany nuclear power plant in the Czech Republic: Local perceptions and statistical evidence

“…The effect of familiarisation is expressed by feelings of risks and unrest that decrease with declining distance from the power plant. As Parkhill et al (2010) pointed out, such familiarity was engendered through 'growing up' with the power plant (it was something that had always been there and had been part of peoples' everyday lives), and through perception of the power plant as a symbol of home. In addition, familiarity was also reinforced through social networks (the experience of working at the power plant; a worker as a family member or friend).…”

“…The concept of "familiarisation of risks" (Parkhill et al, 2010) can be used to support the survey results. The effect of familiarisation is expressed by feelings of risks and unrest that decrease with declining distance from the power plant.…”

“…The acceptance of existing NPPs, which is constructed through the processes of familiarisation and normalisation of risks as a part of everyday life, co-exists here with a more complex set of contradictions (risk, threat and anxiety as a part of everyday life) (Parkhill et al, 2010). The experience of having lived near a NPP affects not only public perceptions of the various potential costs and (especially economic) benefits, but also the importance people attach to the various consequences (Van der Pligt et al, 1986).…”

Climate policies after Fukushima: three views

“…Here, support appears to be solid (Parkhill et al, 2010). Members of Parliament representing constituencies in which nuclear power stations are sited tend to support new build on economic and employment grounds (e.g.…”