Abstract:The crisis of the euro area has questioned the fairness, sustainability and viability of the current setting of the European Monetary Union (EMU). In this article we use a four-country stock–flow consistent (SFC) model in the tradition of Godley/Lavoie (2007a) to examine to what extent an adaptation to Europe of Keynes's plan of a clearing union with bancor balances could help reduce the imbalances that, at least in part, drove the eurozone into crisis. Our simulation experiments suggest that the implementatio… Show more
“…The literature on TARGET2 has continued to evolve in a number of ways, especially with the advent of the Eurosystem's Asset Purchases Programmes (APPs) in 2014. There are econometric studies of how to interpret TARGET2 balances (Abad et al 2013;Auer 2014;Eisenschmidt et al 2017;Chmielewski and Sławiński 2019;Cheung, Steinkamp, and Westermann 2020), technical analyses considering how NCBs can exit the TARGET2 system (Papadia 2014;Malinen et al 2016), scholars analysing the TARGET2 system in relation to the 1944 Keynes Plan for an International Clearing Union (Lavoie 2015;Amato et al 2016;Barredo-Zuriarrain, Molero-Simarro, and Quesada-Solana 2016;Rossi 2016;Mazier and Valdecantos 2019;Kregel 2019), the TARGET2 system as a risk-sharing mechanism (Schelkle 2017), as well as sociological studies focusing on the conceptual ambiguities of the TARGET2 system and how individuals deal with it (Krarup 2016;Sahr 2019). However, we still lack a proper political economy account of the role that the TARGET and TARGET2 systems play for European monetary unification that includes the politics connected to their introduction, the institutional reality they have created, and the process of institutional transformation they have triggered.…”
Section: Figure 1-timeline Of European Monetary Integration and The T...mentioning
When Economic and Monetary Union became effective in January 1999, it remained unclear what accounting treatment to choose for claims and obligations that the Eurosystem’s National Central Banks (NCBs) incur against each other in the ‘Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Express Transfer’ (TARGET) system. The Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) decided only later in 1999 that they should be shifted to the ECB as an intermediating balance sheet—a process called ‘novation’. This decision has decisively shaped the countenance of the monetary union and its fate throughout the subsequent two decades but so far escaped the scrutiny of scholarship in International Political Economy (IPE). This paper adopts the perspective of critical macro-finance, which approaches the monetary system as a hierarchical web of interlocking balance sheets, to study the political-economic role of the TARGET system and its successor, the TARGET2 system. We theorize on monetary unification and show that novation of claims and obligations to a third-party balance sheet is not the only possible solution to ‘stitch together’ separate monetary systems at their apex, but likely was the only one politically feasible. Drawing on historical TARGET and TARGET2 data, we explain how the novation method at the top of the hierarchy has repeatedly served to defend the integrity of the monetary union, both monetarily and politically. It has also enabled the evolution of the ECB balance sheet as an idiosyncratic tool that the Eurosystem could use to tackle multiple problems, in particular setting up swap lines and introducing unconventional monetary policy.
“…The literature on TARGET2 has continued to evolve in a number of ways, especially with the advent of the Eurosystem's Asset Purchases Programmes (APPs) in 2014. There are econometric studies of how to interpret TARGET2 balances (Abad et al 2013;Auer 2014;Eisenschmidt et al 2017;Chmielewski and Sławiński 2019;Cheung, Steinkamp, and Westermann 2020), technical analyses considering how NCBs can exit the TARGET2 system (Papadia 2014;Malinen et al 2016), scholars analysing the TARGET2 system in relation to the 1944 Keynes Plan for an International Clearing Union (Lavoie 2015;Amato et al 2016;Barredo-Zuriarrain, Molero-Simarro, and Quesada-Solana 2016;Rossi 2016;Mazier and Valdecantos 2019;Kregel 2019), the TARGET2 system as a risk-sharing mechanism (Schelkle 2017), as well as sociological studies focusing on the conceptual ambiguities of the TARGET2 system and how individuals deal with it (Krarup 2016;Sahr 2019). However, we still lack a proper political economy account of the role that the TARGET and TARGET2 systems play for European monetary unification that includes the politics connected to their introduction, the institutional reality they have created, and the process of institutional transformation they have triggered.…”
Section: Figure 1-timeline Of European Monetary Integration and The T...mentioning
When Economic and Monetary Union became effective in January 1999, it remained unclear what accounting treatment to choose for claims and obligations that the Eurosystem’s National Central Banks (NCBs) incur against each other in the ‘Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Express Transfer’ (TARGET) system. The Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) decided only later in 1999 that they should be shifted to the ECB as an intermediating balance sheet—a process called ‘novation’. This decision has decisively shaped the countenance of the monetary union and its fate throughout the subsequent two decades but so far escaped the scrutiny of scholarship in International Political Economy (IPE). This paper adopts the perspective of critical macro-finance, which approaches the monetary system as a hierarchical web of interlocking balance sheets, to study the political-economic role of the TARGET system and its successor, the TARGET2 system. We theorize on monetary unification and show that novation of claims and obligations to a third-party balance sheet is not the only possible solution to ‘stitch together’ separate monetary systems at their apex, but likely was the only one politically feasible. Drawing on historical TARGET and TARGET2 data, we explain how the novation method at the top of the hierarchy has repeatedly served to defend the integrity of the monetary union, both monetarily and politically. It has also enabled the evolution of the ECB balance sheet as an idiosyncratic tool that the Eurosystem could use to tackle multiple problems, in particular setting up swap lines and introducing unconventional monetary policy.
“…They find that a multi-speed union produces better results compared to the one that based on the Euro. Mazier and Valdecantos (2019) use an open-economy SFC model to test the effects of Keynes' Bancor on the Euro Area. They find that "the implementation of Keynes' ideas may conduct European countries to a stronger and more sustainable growth cycle" (Mazier and Valdecantos 2019, p. 8).…”
AbstractWe derive the general equilibrium condition for the terms of trade in a two-country economy model. We show that the Marshall–Lerner condition is only a special case of this condition, in which a full exchange rate pass-through to import prices is assumed. In fact, the Marshall–Lerner condition is not even a ‘useful approximation’ of the general condition. For the full pass-through assumption has destabilising, rather than stabilizing, effects, when it is introduced in a stock-flow consistent dynamic model. More generally, the higher (lower) the pass-through, the slower (quicker) is the adjustment of the economy towards the equilibrium. This is tantamount to saying that the speed of adjustment is a positive function of the strategic behaviour of the exporters, who attempt to retain their market share by keeping their foreign currency-denominated prices unchanged.
“…The effects of Keynes' plan on the European Monetary Union have been tested also by Mazier and Valdecantos (2019), who have developed their previous four‐country SFC model (Mazier & Valdecantos, 2015) for this purpose. Their simulation experiments suggested that “the implementation of Keynes” ideas may conduct European countries to a stronger and more sustainable growth cycle' (Mazier & Valdecantos, 2019, p. 8).…”
Section: Open Economy Models In the Sfc Literaturementioning
This paper combines a Stock‐Flow Consistent open economy two‐country model with the Verdoorn‐Kaldor law, which posits a positive relationship between the rate of growth of output and productivity growth. The model shows the role of endogenous productivity as a shock magnifier and underlines the limits of the mechanisms of adjustment that rely exclusively on the “buffer” provided by flexible exchange rates. It also provides arguments in support of fiscal policy both in the context of flexible exchange rates and fixed exchange rates. Finally, it challenges the sustainability of austerity measures aimed to achieve external balance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.