2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-010-9947-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the Anderson Model on a Strip to the DMPK Equation and Random Matrix Theory

Abstract: We study weakly disordered quantum wires whose width is large compared to the Fermi wavelength. It is conjectured that such wires display universal metallic behavior as long as their length is shorter than the localization length (which increases with the width). The random matrix theory that accounts for this behavior-the DMPK theory-rests on assumptions that are in general not satisfied by realistic microscopic models. Starting from the Anderson model on a strip, we show that a twofold scaling limit neverthe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us comment on the limiting process of transfer matrices A(s), and compare it to the ideal ensemble M of Section 2. As already discussed in [1], the overall factor √ 4 − E 2 only corresponds to a redefinition of the mean free path and is irrelevant here. The major difference lies in the diagonal of the processes a, a generating A, which have perfectly correlated diagonal elements, whereas they are independent of each other in their cousins generating M. In the case β = 1, an additional deviation can be found in the variance of the diagonal elements of b, which are smaller here than in the ideal case by a factor √ 2 · N/(N + 1).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us comment on the limiting process of transfer matrices A(s), and compare it to the ideal ensemble M of Section 2. As already discussed in [1], the overall factor √ 4 − E 2 only corresponds to a redefinition of the mean free path and is irrelevant here. The major difference lies in the diagonal of the processes a, a generating A, which have perfectly correlated diagonal elements, whereas they are independent of each other in their cousins generating M. In the case β = 1, an additional deviation can be found in the variance of the diagonal elements of b, which are smaller here than in the ideal case by a factor √ 2 · N/(N + 1).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, we incorporate technical improvements (among other things borrowing some terminology from [20]), mostly concerning the statement of the joint scaling limit in Theorem 8. Finally, we study the convergence as 1 The physically most natural way to discuss β = 4 as well would be to consider electrons with spin, which we chose not to do for reasons of simplicity N → ∞ of a hierarchy of equations for the moments of the conductance introduced by [17]. We prove that the limit satisfies Ohm's law, see Theorem 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first arxiv version of the present paper was followed by the preprint of the paper by Bachmann and De Roeck [3], who, in independent work, also study SDE limits of transfer matrices. We refer the reader to the paper by Bachmann and De Roeck [3] for a discussion of this theory. We refer the reader to the paper by Bachmann and De Roeck [3] for a discussion of this theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a stochastic differential equation (SDE) describing the conductance of a disordered wire with respect to its length in a macroscopic setup. Bachman and de Roeck [2] analyzed the connection of the microscopical Anderson model on a strip to DMPK theory. If the unperturbed operator describes an ideal lead, then they found an SDE describing the evolution of the transfer matrices in an appropriate scaling limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%