Abstract:The title and author names are listed on this sheet as they will be published, both on your paper and on the Table of Contents. Please review and ensure the information is correct and advise us if any changes need to be made. In addition, please review your paper as a whole for typographical and essential corrections. Your PDF proof has been enabled so that you can comment on the proof directly using Adobe Acrobat. For further information on marking corrections using Acrobat, please visit http://journalauthors… Show more
“…Hence, to unlock and address the complex knowledge through teaching, research has become a voice and instrument to share that knowledge, which is intelligible and explicit (Nehme, 2012;Tight, 2016;Brew and Mantai, 2017). Synchronously, besides the application of research-teaching nexus (RTN) by faculty members in the general HE, it has been endorsed by teacher educators in teacher education institutes (Van der Linden et al, 2015;Abdel Latif, 2021;Cao et al, 2021;Gutman, 2021;Kaasila et al, 2021), vocational higher institutes (Griffioen, 2019), field work (Fuller et al, 2014) to furnish student teachers with solid professional development to understand the modern teaching identity (Kaasila et al, 2021), enriching them with cross-cultural knowledge (Gutman, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an up-to-date evidence extracts perceptions showing teacher educators' precedence to teaching due to the nature of the profession, which aims to educate future teachers (Cao et al, 2021). Arguably, integrating research-teaching into teaching practice demands a robust and structured pedagogy designed by a competent faculty member who values the application and integration of research into teaching for the good of the learners (Almendra and Falc ao, 2017;Gutman, 2021). Similarly, students who are exposed to the integration acquire a robust motivation to participate in the teaching environment given that they have a chance to observe their teachers' research work (e.g.…”
PurposeIntegrating research into teaching at higher education institutions (HEIs) has become a current goal of Western countries due to the reliability of this approach in promoting lifelong student learning and improving the teaching quality in higher education. However, integrating research into teaching is not as easy as “pushing a button”; instead, it requires the positive perceptions of teachers and university culture under the 21st-century higher education (HE) paradigm. With regard to HE in non-Western countries, only a small amount of literature exists.Design/methodology/approachThe present study adopted a survey design to compare teachers' perceptions towards research–teaching nexus (RTN) among Pakistan and Ethiopian faculties.FindingsThe current study demonstrated that HE should furnish academics with a research environment that stimulates the integration of research into teaching to empower students with knowledge that they can use in future professional careers.Research limitations/implicationsEven though this study examines two nations with several HEIs, it is limited to universities that could be contacted, so future qualitative studies are needed in the HE systems of both countries to obtain a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of students' and teachers' actual RTN practice.Practical implicationsAiding teachers with an intensive professional development to which illuminate teachers with research, teaching and integrating skills and reform the curriculum, which empowers teachers and students.Originality/valueThe study is conducted in Ethiopia and Pakistan public higher institutions.
“…Hence, to unlock and address the complex knowledge through teaching, research has become a voice and instrument to share that knowledge, which is intelligible and explicit (Nehme, 2012;Tight, 2016;Brew and Mantai, 2017). Synchronously, besides the application of research-teaching nexus (RTN) by faculty members in the general HE, it has been endorsed by teacher educators in teacher education institutes (Van der Linden et al, 2015;Abdel Latif, 2021;Cao et al, 2021;Gutman, 2021;Kaasila et al, 2021), vocational higher institutes (Griffioen, 2019), field work (Fuller et al, 2014) to furnish student teachers with solid professional development to understand the modern teaching identity (Kaasila et al, 2021), enriching them with cross-cultural knowledge (Gutman, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an up-to-date evidence extracts perceptions showing teacher educators' precedence to teaching due to the nature of the profession, which aims to educate future teachers (Cao et al, 2021). Arguably, integrating research-teaching into teaching practice demands a robust and structured pedagogy designed by a competent faculty member who values the application and integration of research into teaching for the good of the learners (Almendra and Falc ao, 2017;Gutman, 2021). Similarly, students who are exposed to the integration acquire a robust motivation to participate in the teaching environment given that they have a chance to observe their teachers' research work (e.g.…”
PurposeIntegrating research into teaching at higher education institutions (HEIs) has become a current goal of Western countries due to the reliability of this approach in promoting lifelong student learning and improving the teaching quality in higher education. However, integrating research into teaching is not as easy as “pushing a button”; instead, it requires the positive perceptions of teachers and university culture under the 21st-century higher education (HE) paradigm. With regard to HE in non-Western countries, only a small amount of literature exists.Design/methodology/approachThe present study adopted a survey design to compare teachers' perceptions towards research–teaching nexus (RTN) among Pakistan and Ethiopian faculties.FindingsThe current study demonstrated that HE should furnish academics with a research environment that stimulates the integration of research into teaching to empower students with knowledge that they can use in future professional careers.Research limitations/implicationsEven though this study examines two nations with several HEIs, it is limited to universities that could be contacted, so future qualitative studies are needed in the HE systems of both countries to obtain a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of students' and teachers' actual RTN practice.Practical implicationsAiding teachers with an intensive professional development to which illuminate teachers with research, teaching and integrating skills and reform the curriculum, which empowers teachers and students.Originality/valueThe study is conducted in Ethiopia and Pakistan public higher institutions.
“…The sphere of student-teacher identity may be characterised by the student-teachers' recognition of teaching as an academic field and the exploration of the teaching-research nexus (Gutman 2021). The main fund of student-teacher identity (Banegas, Pinner, and Larrondo 2022) is disciplinary, which derived from the topics discussed in the module(s).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positioned within an interpretivist paradigm (Atkins and Wallace 2012), this study is framed as teacher research, i.e. research carried out by teachers and teacher educators to understand, problematise, and reflect on their own practice (Borg and Sanchez 2015;Gutman 2021). In this study, I adopted an ecological approach to data collection (Arcidiacono, Procentese, and Di Napoli 2009) as the data came from my regular teaching of a module called Curriculum Development in TESOL.…”
Teachers' professional identity is multifaceted and fluctuating, and while it is formally developed during initial teacher preparation, it is influenced by experiences before and beyond teaching programmes. The aim of this paper is to investigate the extent to which a module on language curriculum development may influence the professional identity formation of international and UK student-teachers enrolled in a master's programme in teaching English to speakers of other languages at a UK university. The study was carried out with 30 student-teachers in 2021, and data were collected from an ecological perspective as data sets came from the regular module delivery. Findings show that the student-teachers articulated four spheres of professional identity. Located in the past, the language learner identity helped them reflect on good practices. Their present studentteacher identity was characterised by their acknowledgement of language education as a research-informed area. Drawing on these two spheres, they displayed two future spheres of professional identity: teacher identity and curriculum developer identity. The latter demonstrates that the module not only enabled the participants to imagine a new career path but also helped them reflect on their anticipatory agency and self-efficacy.
“…While a disciplinary PLCs are usually established on the initiative of academic department heads who wish to reinforce certain issues in teaching a particular field of study, inter-disciplinary in-house PLCs are often created by administrators who seek to leverage the soft academic skills of faculty members in teaching and research. The change in direction these skills frequently takes poses a cultural challenge that characterizes the Israeli teacher education system (Cochran- Smith et al 2020;Gutman 2021).…”
Section: Professional Learning Of Teacher Educators In the Israeli Contextmentioning
The title and author names are listed on this sheet as they will be published, both on your paper and on the Table of Contents. Please review and ensure the information is correct and advise us if any changes need to be made. In addition, please review your paper as a whole for typographical and essential corrections.Your PDF proof has been enabled so that you can comment on the proof directly using Adobe Acrobat. For further information on marking corrections using Acrobat, please visit http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/acrobat.asp; https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/how-to-correct-proofs-with-adobe/ The CrossRef database (www.crossref.org/) has been used to validate the references. Changes resulting from mismatches are tracked in red font.
AUTHOR QUERIESQ1 Please note that the ORCID for Mary Gutman has been created from information provided through CATS. Please correct if this is inaccurate.Q2 Please provide missing Department for the affiliation.Q3 The funding information provided has been checked against the Open Funder Registry and we failed to find a match. Please confirm if the Funding section is accurate and also confirm the funder names.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.