2015
DOI: 10.1057/sj.2015.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From surveillance to torture: The evolution of US interrogation practices during the War on Terror

Abstract: The war on terrorism weakened the distinction between observing suspicious bodies and torturing them. This article examines 'enhanced interrogation' (or torture) practices developed after 9/11 and considers that techniques used overseas by the United States may be applied domestically. The role of the FBI is highlighted since it now has assumed the central authority to interrogate all terrorist suspects held by the United States. Although enhanced interrogation no longer is permitted, the conservative perspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hal ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengatasi tantangan etika yang berkaitan dengan pengambilan keputusan, aturan keterlibatan, dan perlakuan terhadap tawanan perang, dan lain-lain. Jenewa (Greenberg, 2015).…”
Section: Tantangan Etis Utama Yang Dihadapi Pasukan Militer Dalam Men...unclassified
“…Hal ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengatasi tantangan etika yang berkaitan dengan pengambilan keputusan, aturan keterlibatan, dan perlakuan terhadap tawanan perang, dan lain-lain. Jenewa (Greenberg, 2015).…”
Section: Tantangan Etis Utama Yang Dihadapi Pasukan Militer Dalam Men...unclassified
“…For instance, torture survivors often describe that witnessing torture of family members, or the threat of torturing them, is at least as distressing as being tortured themselves (Başoğlu et al, 2007;Pérez-Sales, 2017). From the 1970s, countries like the United States, Israel and Spain, among many others, have moved from scarring physical torture to techniques that leave no permanent marks (Greenberg, 2015;Petersen & Morentin, 2019;Rejali, 2007;Ron, 1997). In terms of proving the existence of a human rights violation, this absence of marks poses a considerable challenge.…”
Section: Torture That Leaves No Permanent Marksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that it is outlawed in most states, torture is still widespread in many countries (Amnesty International, 2018). Many forms of torture hardly leave any mark on the body (Greenberg, 2015;Petersen & Morentin, 2019;Rejali, 2007;Ron, 1997). The absence of physical proof hampers prosecution of perpetrators and leaves victims with scant possibilities to get justice, reparation and redress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%